The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual
Open accessAbstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE To update the melanoma staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) a large database was assembled comprising >46,000 patients from 10 centers worldwide with stages I, II, and III melanoma diagnosed since 1998. Based on analyses of this new database, the existing seventh edition AJCC stage IV database, and contemporary clinical trial data, the AJCC Melanoma Expert Panel introduced several important changes to the Tumor, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) classification and stage grouping criteria. Key changes in the eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual include: 1) tumor thickness measurements to be recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm, not 0.01 mm; 2) definitions of T1a and T1b are revised (T1a, <0.8 mm without ulceration; T1b, 0.8‐1.0 mm with or without ulceration or <0.8 mm with ulceration), with mitotic rate no longer a T category criterion; 3) pathological (but not clinical) stage IA is revised to include T1b N0 M0 (formerly pathologic stage IB); 4) the N category descriptors “microscopic” and “macroscopic” for regional node metastasis are redefined as “clinically occult” and “clinically apparent”; 5) prognostic stage III groupings are based on N category criteria and T category criteria (ie, primary tumor thickness and ulceration) and increased from 3 to 4 subgroups (stages IIIA‐IIID); 6) definitions of N subcategories are revised, with the presence of microsatellites, satellites, or in‐transit metastases now categorized as N1c, N2c, or N3c based on the number of tumor‐involved regional lymph nodes, if any; 7) descriptors are added to each M1 subcategory designation for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (LDH elevation no longer upstages to M1c); and 8) a new M1d designation is added for central nervous system metastases. This evidence‐based revision of the AJCC melanoma staging system will guide patient treatment, provide better prognostic estimates, and refine stratification of patients entering clinical trials. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:472‐492. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Hodi, F. S., O'Day, S. J., McDermott, D. F., Weber, R. W., Sosman, J. A., Haanen, J. B., Gonzalez, R., Robert, C., Schadendorf, D., Hassel, J. C., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003466 · Cited by 15,155
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
Larkin, J., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Gonzalez, R., Grob, J. J., Cowey, C. L., Lao, C. D., Schadendorf, D., Dummer, R., Smylie, M., Rutkowski, P., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504030 · Cited by 8,157
Self-citationImproved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation
Chapman, P. B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., Haanen, J. B., Ascierto, P., Larkin, J., Dummer, R., Garbe, C., Testori, A., Maio, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103782 · Cited by 7,720
Self-citationPembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Robert, C., Schachter, J., Long, G. V., Arance, A., Grob, J. J., Mortier, L., Daud, A., Carlino, M. S., McNeil, C., Lotem, M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1503093 · Cited by 5,887
Self-citationNivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without BRAF Mutation
Robert, C., Long, G. V., Brady, B., Dutriaux, C., Maio, M., Mortier, L., Hassel, J. C., Rutkowski, P., McNeil, C., Kalinka-Warzocha, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1412082 · Cited by 5,519
Self-citationCombined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations
Flaherty, K. T., Infante, J. R., Daud, A., Gonzalez, R., Kefford, R. F., Sosman, J., Hamid, O., Schuchter, L., Cebon, J., Ibrahim, N., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1210093 · Cited by 2,810
Self-citationAdjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma
Weber, J., Mandala, M., Del Vecchio, M., Gogas, H. J., Arance, A. M., Cowey, C. L., Dalle, S., Schenker, M., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Marquez-Rodas, I., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1709030 · Cited by 2,246
Self-citationIpilimumab in patients with melanoma and brain metastases: an open-label, phase 2 trial
Margolin, K., Ernstoff, M. S., Hamid, O., Lawrence, D., McDermott, D., Puzanov, I., Wolchok, J. D., Clark, J. I., Sznol, M., Logan, T. F., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70090-6 · Cited by 1,091
Cited by
Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy
Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M., & Pardoll, D. M. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax0182 · Cited by 1,001
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma
Amaria, R. N., Reddy, S. M., Tawbi, H. A., Davies, M. A., Ross, M. I., Glitza, I. C., Cormier, J. N., Lewis, C., Hwu, W.-J., Hanna, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1 · Cited by 835
Self-citationLong, G. V., Swetter, S. M., Menzies, A. M., Gershenwald, J. E., & Scolyer, R. A. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00821-8 · Cited by 746
Self-citationRozeman, E. A., Menzies, A. M., van Akkooi, A. C. J., Adhikari, C., Bierman, C., van de Wiel, B. A., Scolyer, R. A., Krijgsman, O., Sikorska, K., Eriksson, H., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30151-2 · Cited by 537
Self-citationMelanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond
Gershenwald, J. E., & Scolyer, R. A. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6513-7 · Cited by 452
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gershenwald, J. E., Scolyer, R. A., Hess, K. R., Sondak, V. K., Long, G. V., Ross, M. I., Lazar, A. J., Faries, M. B., Kirkwood, J. M., McArthur, G. A., Haydu, L. E., Eggermont, A. M. M., Flaherty, K. T., Balch, C. M., Thompson, J. F., & for members of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Expert Panel and the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform
- Venue
- CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-13
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 472-492
- ISSN
- 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4863
- OpenAlex
- W2762347490
- Cited by
- 2,283
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 87.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3322/caac.21409
- The paper
- Gershenwald, J. E., Scolyer, R. A., Hess, K. R., Sondak, V. K., Long, G. V., Ross, M. I., Lazar, A. J., Faries, M. B., Kirkwood, J. M., McArthur, G. A., Haydu, L. E., Eggermont, A. M. M., Flaherty, K. T., Balch, C. M., Thompson, J. F., & for members of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Expert Panel and the International Melanoma Database and Discovery Platform. (2017). Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
