Cited by 370Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrailty in Older AdultsColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019

Open access
DeSantis, Carol E., Miller, Kimberly D., Dale, William, Mohile, Supriya G., Cohen, Harvey J., Leach, Corinne R., Goding Sauer, Ann, Jemal, Ahmedin +1 more·2019·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

Adults aged 85 years and older, the “oldest old,” are the fastest‐growing age group in the United States, yet relatively little is known about their cancer burden. Combining data from the National Cancer Institute, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Center for Health Statistics, the authors provide comprehensive information on cancer occurrence in adults aged 85 years and older. In 2019, there will be approximately 140,690 cancer cases diagnosed and 103,250 cancer deaths among the oldest old in the United States. The most common cancers in these individuals (lung, breast, prostate, and colorectum) are the same as those in the general population. Overall cancer incidence rates peaked in the oldest men and women around 1990 and have subsequently declined, with the pace accelerating during the past decade. These trends largely reflect declines in cancers of the prostate and colorectum and, more recently, cancers of the lung among men and the breast among women. We note differences in trends for some cancers in the oldest age group (eg, lung cancer and melanoma) compared with adults aged 65 to 84 years, which reflect elevated risks in the oldest generations. In addition, cancers in the oldest old are often more advanced at diagnosis. For example, breast and colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients aged 85 years and older are about 10% less likely to be diagnosed at a local stage compared with those diagnosed in patients aged 65 to 84 years. Patients with cancer who are aged 85 years and older have the lowest relative survival of any age group, with the largest disparities noted when cancer is diagnosed at advanced stages. They are also less likely to receive surgical treatment for their cancers; only 65% of breast cancer patients aged 85 years and older received surgery compared with 89% of those aged 65 to 84 years. This difference may reflect the complexities of treating older patients, including the presence of multiple comorbidities, functional declines, and cognitive impairment, as well as competing mortality risks and undertreatment. More research on cancer in the oldest Americans is needed to improve outcomes and anticipate the complex health care needs of this rapidly growing population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/caac.21577

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 370

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Crimmins EM, Preston SH, Cohen B, eds. Explaining Divergent Levels of Longevity in High-Income Countries. National Research Council Panel on Understanding Divergent Trends in Longevity in High-Income Countries. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2011. 21977544

Authors
DeSantis, C. E., Miller, K. D., Dale, W., Mohile, S. G., Cohen, H. J., Leach, C. R., Goding Sauer, A., Jemal, A., & Siegel, R. L.
Affiliations
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Surveillance and Health Services Research American Cancer Society Atlanta Georgia
Corresponding author
DeSantis, Carol E.
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-07
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
452-467
ISSN
  • 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4863
OpenAlex
W2964702710
Cited by
370
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 3
FWCI
19.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K24AG056589)
  • National Cancer Institute (UG1CA189961)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
oldest old, cancer incidence, cancer mortality, cancer incidence trends, lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, stage at diagnosis, relative survival, undertreatment, comorbidities, population aging
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, SEER Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review