Cited by 9,533Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Cancer statistics, 2024

Open access
Siegel, Rebecca L., Giaquinto, Angela N., Jemal, Ahmedin·2024·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population‐based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries (through 2020) and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (through 2021). In 2024, 2,001,140 new cancer cases and 611,720 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Cancer mortality continued to decline through 2021, averting over 4 million deaths since 1991 because of reductions in smoking, earlier detection for some cancers, and improved treatment options in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. However, these gains are threatened by increasing incidence for 6 of the top 10 cancers. Incidence rates increased during 2015–2019 by 0.6%–1% annually for breast, pancreas, and uterine corpus cancers and by 2%–3% annually for prostate, liver (female), kidney, and human papillomavirus‐associated oral cancers and for melanoma. Incidence rates also increased by 1%–2% annually for cervical (ages 30–44 years) and colorectal cancers (ages <55 years) in young adults. Colorectal cancer was the fourth‐leading cause of cancer death in both men and women younger than 50 years in the late‐1990s but is now first in men and second in women. Progress is also hampered by wide persistent cancer disparities; compared to White people, mortality rates are two‐fold higher for prostate, stomach and uterine corpus cancers in Black people and for liver, stomach, and kidney cancers in Native American people. Continued national progress will require increased investment in cancer prevention and access to equitable treatment, especially among American Indian and Alaska Native and Black individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/caac.21820

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awareness of the impacts of SDOH on health outcomes is evident from the oncology literature, largely due to the persistent disparities, substantial barriers to treatment, and the financial toxicity commonly associated with cancer care.

    “Awareness of the impacts of SDOH on health outcomes is evident from the oncology literature, largely due to the persistent disparities, substantial barriers to treatment, and the financial toxicity commonly associated with cancer care1,2,8,9,18.”

    From Documentation of individual-level social determinants of health among adults diagnosed with cancer in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The “Cancer disparities by race and ethnicity” section links structural racism and poverty to worse cancer outcomes and describes unequal access to screening and recommended treatment. The Conclusion calls for expanded access to high-quality care. These passages support the disparities and treatment-barriers portions of the claim, but the passages found do not discuss financial toxicity associated with cancer care. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 135 · Cited by 9,533

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Arias E, Xu J, Curtin S, Bastian B, Tejada-Vera B. Mortality profile of the non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native population, 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021;70(12):1-27.
  2. Harris JE. Cigarette smoking among successive birth cohorts of men and women in the United States during 1900-80. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983;71(3):473-479.
  3. - CANCER STATISTICS, 2024 15424863, 0, Downloaded from https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21820, Wiley Online Library on [17/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License 108.
  4. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking his- tory, and lung cancer histology. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3976-3983. doi:10.1002/cncr.28326 112. Fedewa SA, Bandi P, Smith RA, Silvestri GA, Jemal A. Lung cancer screening rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chest. 2022; 161(2):586-589. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.030 113. Wolf AMD, Oeffinger KC, Shih TY, et al. Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023. Portico. doi:10.3322/caac.21811 114. · DOI
  5. Giaquinto AN, Broaddus RR, Jemal A, Siegel RL. The changing landscape of gynecologic cancer mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(3):440-442. doi:10.1097/aog.00000000 00004676 119. Doll R. Progress against cancer: an epidemiologic assessment. The 1991 John C. Cassel Memorial Lecture. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134(7):675-688. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116143 120. · DOI
  6. Nelson DE, Mowery P, Asman K, et al. Long-term trends in adolescent and young adult smoking in the United States: meta- patterns and implications. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(5):905-915. doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.115931 123. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer disparities by race/- ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(2): 78-93. doi:10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78 124. Bach PB, Schrag D, Brawley OW, Galaznik A, Yakren S, Begg CB. Survival of Blacks and Whites after a cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2106-2113. doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2106 125. · DOI
  7. Islami F, Guerra CE, Minihan A, et al. American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(2):112-143. doi:10.3322/caac. 21703 130. Moss JL, Pinto CN, Srinivasan S, Cronin KA, Croyle RT. Enduring cancer disparities by persistent poverty, rurality, and race: 1990- 1992 to 2014-2018. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(6):829-836. doi:10.1093/jnci/djac038 131. · DOI
  8. Collin LJ, Gaglioti AH, Beyer KMM, et al. Neighborhood-level redlining and lending bias are associated with breast cancer mor- tality in a large and diverse metropolitan area. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(1):53-60. doi:10.1158/EPI-20-1038 134. · DOI
  9. Nguyen BT, Han X, Jemal A, Drope J. Diet quality, risk factors and access to care among low-income uninsured American adults in states expanding Medicaid vs. states not expanding under the Affordable Care Act. Prev Med. 2016;91:169-171. doi:10.1016/j. ypmed.2016.08.015 143. Sommers BD, Gawande AA, Baicker K. Health insurance coverage and health-what the recent evidence tells us. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(6):586-593. doi:10.1056/nejmsb1706645 144. · DOI
  10. Falcaro M, Castañon A, Ndlela B, et al. The effects of the national HPV vaccination programme in England, UK, on cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia incidence: a register- based observational study. Lancet. 2021;398(10316):2084-2092. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02178-4 149. Kantarjian HM, Keating MJ, Freireich EJ. Toward the potential cure of leukemias in the next decade. Cancer. 2018;124(22):4301-4313. doi:10.1002/cncr.31669 150. · DOI

Authors
Siegel, R. L., Giaquinto, A. N., & Jemal, A.
Affiliations
American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Siegel, Rebecca L.
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
12-49
ISSN
  • 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4863
OpenAlex
W4390946922
Cited by
9,533
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 1737 · 2025: 5047 · 2024: 2740 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1634.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-02-16)
Open access
Locations
  • CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
cancer incidence, cancer mortality, cancer incidence trends, cancer mortality trends, cancer disparities, racial and ethnic disparities, cancer prevention
MeSH terms
White, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Neoplasms, Registries, Smoking, United States, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review