Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity

Open access
Ghafoor, A., Jemal, A., Ward, E., Cokkinides, V., Smith, R., Thun, M.·2003·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

In this article, the American Cancer Society (ACS) describes trends in incidence, mortality, and survival rates of female breast cancer in the United States by race and ethnicity. It also provides estimates of new cases and deaths and shows trends in screening mammography. The incidence and survival data derive from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; mortality data are from the National Center for Health Statistics. Approximately 211,300 new cases of invasive breast cancer, 55,700 in situ cases, and 39,800 deaths are expected to occur among women in the United States in 2003. Breast cancer incidence rates have increased among women of all races combined and white women since the early 1980s. The increasing rate in white women predominantly involves small (< or = 2 cm) and localized-stage tumors, although a small increase in the incidence of regional-stage tumors and those larger than five cm occurred since the early 1990s. The incidence rate among African American women stabilized during the 1990s for all breast cancers and for localized tumors. African American women are more likely than white women to be diagnosed with large tumors and distant-stage disease. Other racial and ethnic groups have lower incidence rates than do either white or African American women. However, the proportion of disease diagnosed at advanced stage and with larger tumor size in all minorities is greater than in white persons. Death rates decreased by 2.5% per year among white women since 1990 and by 1% per year among African American women since 1991. The disparity in mortality rates between white and African American women increased progressively between 1980 and 2000, so that by 2000 the age-standardized death rate was 32% higher in African Americans. Clinicians should be aware that 63% and 29% of breast cancers are diagnosed at local- and regional-stage disease, for which the five-year relative survival rates are 97% and 79%, respectively. This information, coupled with decreasing mortality rates and improvements in treatment, may motivate women to have regular mammographic and clinical breast examinations. Continued efforts are needed to increase the availability of high-quality mammography and treatment to all segments of the population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/canjclin.53.6.342

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

  • Cancer statistics, 2016

    Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2016) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21332 · Cited by 16,003

    “The historically higher incidence rate among white women is thought to reflect a combination of factors that affect both diagnosis (more prevalent mammography) and underlying disease occurrence (such as later age at first birth and greater use of menopausal hormone therapy).(63) However, a recent study reported that b…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation
  • Cancer Statistics, 2010

    Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20073 · Cited by 12,596

    Self-citation
  • Cancer statistics, 2015

    Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21254 · Cited by 11,853

    Self-citation
  • Cancer statistics, 2013

    Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2013) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21166 · Cited by 11,825

    Self-citation
  • Cancer statistics, 2014

    Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21208 · Cited by 11,499

    Self-citation

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Ghafoor, A., Jemal, A., Ward, E., Cokkinides, V., Smith, R., & Thun, M.
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
342-355
ISSN
0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118651985
Cited by
451
References
29
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3322/canjclin.53.6.342
The paper
Ghafoor, A., Jemal, A., Ward, E., Cokkinides, V., Smith, R., & Thun, M. (2003). Trends in Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.53.6.342

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.