The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase I study of sorafenib in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemias
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Background Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor with activity against fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 with internal tandem duplication mutation and Raf kinase among others. A phase I dose escalation study of sorafenib was conducted in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome and relapsed or refractory acute leukemias. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty patients received one of two different schedules; Schedule "A": once or twice daily, five days per week, every week for a 21 day cycle, and Schedule "B": once or twice daily, for 14 days every 21 days. Dose limiting toxicities were grade 3/4 hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, and amylase elevation. The recommended phase II dose in hematologic malignancies is 400 mg twice daily for both schedules. RESULTS: Complete remissions or complete remissions with incomplete recovery of platelets were achieved in 5 (10%) patients (all with fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication). Significant reduction in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood blasts was seen in an additional 17 (34%) patients (all with fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication). Eleven of these responses (including 3 complete remissions/complete remissions with incomplete recovery) lasted for 2 cycles or beyond. In conclusion, sorafenib is active and well tolerated in acute myelogenous leukemia with fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication mutation. Conclusions Additional studies of sorafenib in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia, particularly those with fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication, are warranted, including sorafenib-based combinations. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00217646).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
‘Acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2016 update’
De Kouchkovsky, I., & Abdul-Hay, M. (2016) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2016.50 · Cited by 1,317
Gilteritinib or Chemotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory FLT3 -Mutated AML
Perl, A. E., Martinelli, G., Cortes, J. E., Neubauer, A., Berman, E., Paolini, S., Montesinos, P., Baer, M. R., Larson, R. A., Ustun, C., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1902688 · Cited by 1,287
Self-citationTargeting FLT3 mutations in AML: review of current knowledge and evidence
Daver, N., Schlenk, R. F., Russell, N. H., & Levis, M. J. (2019) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0357-9 · Cited by 1,075
Perl, A. E., Altman, J. K., Cortes, J., Smith, C., Litzow, M., Baer, M. R., Claxton, D., Erba, H. P., Gill, S., Goldberg, S., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30416-3 · Cited by 490
Self-citationRöllig, C., Serve, H., Hüttmann, A., Noppeney, R., Müller-Tidow, C., Krug, U., Baldus, C. D., Brandts, C. H., Kunzmann, V., Einsele, H., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00362-9 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Borthakur, G., Kantarjian, H., Ravandi, F., Zhang, W., Konopleva, M., Wright, J. J., Faderl, S., Verstovsek, S., Mathews, S., Andreeff, M., & Cortes, J. E.
- Venue
- Haematologica
- Published
- 2010-10-15
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-68
- ISSN
- 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
- 1592-8721
- OpenAlex
- W1985620267
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I study of sorafenib in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3324/haematol.2010.030452
- The paper
- Borthakur, G., Kantarjian, H., Ravandi, F., Zhang, W., Konopleva, M., Wright, J. J., Faderl, S., Verstovsek, S., Mathews, S., Andreeff, M., & Cortes, J. E. (2011). Phase I study of sorafenib in patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemias. Haematologica. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.030452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.