Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as the stem cell source for sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia: survival advantage for bone marrow in all age groups

Open access
Bacigalupo, A., Socie, G., Schrezenmeier, H., Tichelli, A., Locasciulli, A., Fuehrer, M., Risitano, A. M., Dufour, C., Passweg, J. R., Oneto, R., Aljurf, M., Flynn, C., Mialou, V., Hamladji, R. M., Marsh, J. C. W., for the Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WPSAA-EBMT)·2012·Haematologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow has been shown to be superior to peripheral blood, as a stem cell source, in young patients (<20 years of age) with acquired aplastic anemia undergoing a matched sibling transplant. The aim of this study was to test whether this currently also holds true for older patients with acquired aplastic anemia. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed 1886 patients with acquired aplastic anemia who received a first transplant from a human leukocyte antigen identical sibling between 1999 and 2009, with either bone marrow (n=1163) or peripheral blood (n=723) as the source of stem cells. RESULTS: In multivariate Cox analysis negative predictors for survival were: patient's age over 20 years (RR 2.0, P<0.0001), an interval between diagnosis and transplantation of more than 114 days (RR 1.3, P=0.006), no anti-thymocyte globulin in the conditioning (RR 1.6, P=0.0001), a conditioning regimen other than cyclophosphamide (RR=1.3, P=0.008) and the use of peripheral blood as the source of stem cells (RR 1.6, P<0.00001). The survival advantage for recipients of bone marrow rather than peripheral blood was statistically significant in patients aged 1-19 years (90% versus 76% P<0.00001) as well as in patients aged over 20 years (74% versus 64%, P=0.001). The advantage for recipients of bone marrow over peripheral blood was maintained above the age of 50 years (69% versus 39%, P=0.01). Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were more frequent in peripheral blood transplants. Major causes of death were graft-versus-host disease (2% versus 6% in bone marrow and peripheral blood recipients, respectively), infections (6% versus 13%), and graft rejection (1.5% versus 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that bone marrow should be the preferred stem cell source for matched sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia, in patients of all age groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3324/haematol.2011.054841

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Bacigalupo, A., Socie, G., Schrezenmeier, H., Tichelli, A., Locasciulli, A., Fuehrer, M., Risitano, A. M., Dufour, C., Passweg, J. R., Oneto, R., Aljurf, M., Flynn, C., Mialou, V., Hamladji, R. M., Marsh, J. C. W., & for the Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WPSAA-EBMT)
Venue
Haematologica
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
97
Issue
8
Pages
1142-1148
ISSN
  • 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1592-8721
OpenAlex
W2127660435
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as the stem cell source for sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia: survival advantage for bone marrow in all age groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3324/haematol.2011.054841
The paper
Bacigalupo, A., Socie, G., Schrezenmeier, H., Tichelli, A., Locasciulli, A., Fuehrer, M., Risitano, A. M., Dufour, C., Passweg, J. R., Oneto, R., Aljurf, M., Flynn, C., Mialou, V., Hamladji, R. M., Marsh, J. C. W., & for the Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WPSAA-EBMT). (2012). Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as the stem cell source for sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia: survival advantage for bone marrow in all age groups. Haematologica. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.054841

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.