Cited by 22CAR-T cell therapy researchMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy with optimized human scFv for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from phase I clinical trials

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3324/haematol.2022.280629

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In phase I studies of CT053, 24 patients received a dose ranging from 0.5 to 1.8 × 10^6 CT053 cells, and the ORR was 87.5%.

    “In the phase I studies (NCT03302403, NCT03380039, NCT03716856), 24 patients received a dose ranging from 0.5 to 1.8 × 10^6 CT053 cells, the ORR was 87.5%, indicating a high rate of response to CT053 treatment, with 79.2% patients achieved CR (12.5%) or sCR (66.7%), demonstrating deep and durable responses, and the median follow-up time was 17.4 months, the mPFS was 18.8 months and the mDOR was 21.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [250]

    The phase I trial results (page not provided) report that 24 patients received CT053 and that the overall response rate was 87.5%. The reported dose range was 0.5–1.8 × 10^8 cells, not 0.5–1.8 × 10^6 cells as claimed. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In these studies, 79.2% of patients achieved CR (12.5%) or sCR (66.7%).

    “In the phase I studies (NCT03302403, NCT03380039, NCT03716856), 24 patients received a dose ranging from 0.5 to 1.8 × 10^6 CT053 cells, the ORR was 87.5%, indicating a high rate of response to CT053 treatment, with 79.2% patients achieved CR (12.5%) or sCR (66.7%), demonstrating deep and durable responses, and the median follow-up time was 17.4 months, the mPFS was 18.8 months and the mDOR was 21.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [250]

  • The median follow-up was 17.4 months, the mPFS was 18.8 months, and the mDOR was 21.8 months.

    “In the phase I studies (NCT03302403, NCT03380039, NCT03716856), 24 patients received a dose ranging from 0.5 to 1.8 × 10^6 CT053 cells, the ORR was 87.5%, indicating a high rate of response to CT053 treatment, with 79.2% patients achieved CR (12.5%) or sCR (66.7%), demonstrating deep and durable responses, and the median follow-up time was 17.4 months, the mPFS was 18.8 months and the mDOR was 21.”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [250]

  • Anti-drug antibody was not detected in patients after CT053 infusion.

    “Anti-drug antibody (ADA) was not detected in patients after infusion, suggesting no significant immunogenicity associated with CT053 treatment, and CT053 demonstrated strong efficacy and a good safety profile for patients with RRMM [250].”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [250]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brudno JN, Maric I, Hartman SD. T cells genetically modified to express an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(22):2267-2280. · DOI
  2. Xu J, Chen LJ, Yang SS. Exploratory trial of a biepitopic CAR T-targeting B cell maturation antigen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(19):9543-9551. · DOI
  3. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(8):e328-e346.
  4. Hudecek M, Lupo-Stanghellini MT, Kosasih PL. Receptor affinity and extracellular domain modifications affect tumor recognition by ROR1-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(12):3153-3164. · DOI
  5. Liu X, Jiang S, Fang C. Affinity-tuned ErbB2 or EGFR chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit an increased therapeutic index against tumors in mice. Cancer Res. 2015; 75(17):3596-3607. · DOI
  6. Smith EL, Staehr M, Masakayan R. Development and evaluation of an optimal human single-chain variable fragment-derived BCMA-targeted CAR T cell vector. Mol Ther. 2018; 26(6):1447-1456. · DOI
  7. Gust J, Hay KA, Hanafi LA. Endothelial activation and blood-brain barrier disruption in neurotoxicity after adoptive immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T cells. Cancer Discov. 2017; 7(12):1404-1419. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Usmani SZ, Rodriguez-Otero P, Bhutani M, Mateos MV, Miguel JS. Defining and treating high-risk multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2015; 29(11):2119-2125. · DOI
  9. Zhao WH, Liu J, Wang BY. A phase 1, open-label study of LCAR-B38M, a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy directed against B cell maturation antigen, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2018; 11(1):141. · DOI
  10. Yan Z, Cao J, Cheng H. A combination of humanised anti-CD19 and anti-BCMA CAR T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019; 6(10):e521-e529. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, M., Zhang, W., Yu, K., Wang, P., Jiang, H., Chen, L., Meng, H., Weng, Y., Tao, R., Huang, X., Xing, C., Wang, H., Wan, J., Wang, S., Dai, L., Hendrix, A. Y., Xiao, J., Wang, W., Ma, H., Hao, S., Jin, J., Li, Z., & Jiang, S.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Min
  • Zhang, Wenhao
  • Yu, Kang
  • Wang, Peng
  • Jiang, Hua
  • Hao, Siguo
  • Jin, Jie
  • Li, Zonghai
  • Jiang, Songfu
Venue
Haematologica
Published
2022-04-21
Volume
107
Issue
8
Pages
1960-1965
ISSN
  • 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1592-8721
OpenAlex
W4224241187
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Haematologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
BCMA, CAR T-cell therapy, scFv, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, bispecific T-cell engagers
MeSH terms
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, B-Cell Maturation Antigen, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review