Cited by 39Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Smoking guns and volcanic ash: the importance of sparse tephras in Greenland ice cores

Open access
Plunkett, Gill, Sigl, Michael, Pilcher, Jonathan R., McConnell, Joseph R., Chellman, Nathan, Steffensen, J.P., Büntgen, Ulf·2020·Polar Research

Abstract

Volcanic ash (fine-grained tephra) within Greenland ice cores can complement the understanding of past volcanism and its environmental and societal impacts. The presence of ash in sparse concentrations in the ice raises questions about whether such material represents primary ashfall in Greenland or resuspended (remobilized) material from continental areas. In this article, we investigate this issue by examining tephra content in quasi-annual samples from two Greenland ice cores during a period of ca. 20 years and considering their relationships with sulphur and particulate data from the same cores. We focus on the interval 815–835 CE as it encompasses a phase (818–822 CE) of heightened volcanogenic sulphur previously ascribed to an eruption of Katla, Iceland. We find that tephra is a frequent but not continuous feature within the ice, unlike similarly sized particulate matter. A solitary ash shard whose major element geochemistry is consistent with Katla corroborates the attribution of the 822±1 CE sulphur peak to this source, clearly showing that a single shard can signify primary ashfall. Other tephras are present in similarly low abundances, but their geochemistries are less certainly attributable to specific sources. Although these tephra shards tend to coincide with elevated sulphur and fine (<10 µm) particulates, they are not associated with increased coarse (>10 µm) particle concentrations that might be expected if the shards had been transported by dust storms. We conclude that the sparse shards derive from primary ashfall, and we argue that low tephra concentrations should not be dismissed as insignificant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33265/polar.v39.3511

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of the approach based on exact stratigraphic co-registration of insoluble particulates and volcanic volatiles in polar ice cores has proven highly successful for detecting cryptotephra layers.

    “the application of this approach, based on the exact stratigraphic co-registration of insoluble particulates and volcanic volatiles in the polar ice cores, has proven highly successful for detecting cryptotephra layers 19,33,[98][99][100][101][102][103] .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 39

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Post J. 2016. Reconstructing the eruption history of El Chichón volcano from river terraces (Chiapas, Mexico). Master's thesis, Dept. of Earth Science, University of Utrecht.
  2. Sigl M., Winstrup M., McConnell J.R., Welten K.C., Plun- kett G., Ludlow F., Büntgen U., Caffee M., Chellman N., Dahl-Jensen D., Fischer H., Kipfstuhl S., Kostick C., Maselli O.J., Mekhaldi F., Mulvaney R., Muscheler R., Pas- teris D.R., Pilcher J.R., Salzer M., Schüpbach S., Steffensen J.P., Vinther B.M. & Woodruff T.E. 2015. Timing and cli- mate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years. Nature 523, 543-549, doi: 10.1038/nature14565. · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Plunkett, G., Sigl, M., Pilcher, J. R., McConnell, J. R., Chellman, N., Steffensen, J. P., & Büntgen, U.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Desert Research Institute (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
Venue
Polar Research
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
39
Issue
0
ISSN
  • 0800-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8369
OpenAlex
W3028591819
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polar Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (TUNU2013)
  • Aberystwyth University
  • Office of Polar Programs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
volcanic ash, tephra, Greenland ice cores, dust storms, particulate matter, tephra geochemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review