Smoking guns and volcanic ash: the importance of sparse tephras in Greenland ice cores
Open accessAbstract
Volcanic ash (fine-grained tephra) within Greenland ice cores can complement the understanding of past volcanism and its environmental and societal impacts. The presence of ash in sparse concentrations in the ice raises questions about whether such material represents primary ashfall in Greenland or resuspended (remobilized) material from continental areas. In this article, we investigate this issue by examining tephra content in quasi-annual samples from two Greenland ice cores during a period of ca. 20 years and considering their relationships with sulphur and particulate data from the same cores. We focus on the interval 815–835 CE as it encompasses a phase (818–822 CE) of heightened volcanogenic sulphur previously ascribed to an eruption of Katla, Iceland. We find that tephra is a frequent but not continuous feature within the ice, unlike similarly sized particulate matter. A solitary ash shard whose major element geochemistry is consistent with Katla corroborates the attribution of the 822±1 CE sulphur peak to this source, clearly showing that a single shard can signify primary ashfall. Other tephras are present in similarly low abundances, but their geochemistries are less certainly attributable to specific sources. Although these tephra shards tend to coincide with elevated sulphur and fine (<10 µm) particulates, they are not associated with increased coarse (>10 µm) particle concentrations that might be expected if the shards had been transported by dust storms. We conclude that the sparse shards derive from primary ashfall, and we argue that low tephra concentrations should not be dismissed as insignificant.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The application of the approach based on exact stratigraphic co-registration of insoluble particulates and volcanic volatiles in polar ice cores has proven highly successful for detecting cryptotephra layers.
“the application of this approach, based on the exact stratigraphic co-registration of insoluble particulates and volcanic volatiles in the polar ice cores, has proven highly successful for detecting cryptotephra layers 19,33,[98][99][100][101][102][103] .”
From Decadal-to-centennial increases of volcanic aerosols from Iceland challenge the concept of a Medieval Quiet Period (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 39
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Post J. 2016. Reconstructing the eruption history of El Chichón volcano from river terraces (Chiapas, Mexico). Master's thesis, Dept. of Earth Science, University of Utrecht.
- Sigl M., Winstrup M., McConnell J.R., Welten K.C., Plun- kett G., Ludlow F., Büntgen U., Caffee M., Chellman N., Dahl-Jensen D., Fischer H., Kipfstuhl S., Kostick C., Maselli O.J., Mekhaldi F., Mulvaney R., Muscheler R., Pas- teris D.R., Pilcher J.R., Salzer M., Schüpbach S., Steffensen J.P., Vinther B.M. & Woodruff T.E. 2015. Timing and cli- mate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years. Nature 523, 543-549, doi: 10.1038/nature14565. · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Plunkett, G., Sigl, M., Pilcher, J. R., McConnell, J. R., Chellman, N., Steffensen, J. P., & Büntgen, U.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Desert Research Institute (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Masaryk University (CZ)
- Venue
- Polar Research
- Publisher
- Norwegian Polar Institute
- Published
- 2020-06-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 0
- ISSN
- 0800-0395 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8369
- OpenAlex
- W3028591819
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Polar Research (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (TUNU2013)
- Aberystwyth University
- Office of Polar Programs
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Keywords
- volcanic ash, tephra, Greenland ice cores, dust storms, particulate matter, tephra geochemistry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review