Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,035

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doctor Patient Communication: A Review

Open access
Begum, Tahmina·2015·Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons

Abstract

Communication between patients and health professionals is seen as the core clinical function in building a therapeutic doctor-patient relationship, which is the heart and art of the medicine. Patients’ satisfaction is strongly influenced by the quality of the communication that occurs. Effective communication is the basis of mutual understanding and trust. This paper aims to raise awareness on the important issues involved in doctor-patient and inter-professional communication among the medical professionals.J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2014; 32: 84-88

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3329/jbcps.v32i2.26036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,035

Metadata

Authors
Begum, T.
Venue
Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons
Published
2015-12-23
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
84-88
ISSN
1015-0870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2279784851
Cited by
1,035
References
1
FWCI
116.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doctor Patient Communication: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3329/jbcps.v32i2.26036
The paper
Begum, T. (2015). Doctor Patient Communication: A Review. Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v32i2.26036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.