Cited by 32Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceMental Health Treatment and AccessSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Paramedic-conducted Mental Health Counselling for Abused Women in Rural Bangladesh: An Evaluation from the Perspective of Participants

Open access
Naved, Ruchira T, Rimi, Nadia A, Jahan, Shamshad, Lindmark, Gunilla·2009·Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

Abstract

This paper reports on evaluation of an initiative to use paramedics as the first-level mental health counsellors of abused women in rural Bangladesh (2003-2004) from the perspective of the abused women who participated in one or more counselling sessions. Thirty in-depth interviews, followed by a survey(n=372), targeted to cover all participants, were conducted in 2006. Overall, the arrangement, management of ethical issues, and skills of paramedics were rated favourably. Most (89%) abused women (n=372) considered the session useful; one-fourth of these women considered it very useful; and only a few abused women considered the session useless. Usefulness of the session was expressed mostly in terms of relief attained after talking about the issue. Most (87%) women reported being encouraged to be self-confident. In a context characterized by low self-confidence of women, lack of opportunity to talk about violence, and absence of professional mental health counselling services, this initiative is sufficiently promising to warrant further testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3329/jhpn.v27i4.3391

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Chaudoir et al. framework is particularly helpful for task-sharing because it explicitly includes the characteristics of providers, which have been found to influence implementation and intervention outcomes.

    “The Chaudoir et al. [35] framework is particularly helpful for task-sharing because it explicitly includes the characteristics of the providers, which have been found to influence implementation and intervention (i.e., client and service) outcomes [10, 36–38].”

    From Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks (2022) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results (section ‘Determinants of considering the session useful’; page not provided) link a paramedic’s encouragement to a client-rated outcome: women strongly encouraged to explore a way out of violence were almost seven times more likely to rate the session as very useful. This supports a link between provider behaviour and a client outcome, but the paper does not establish an effect on implementation outcomes. The statement about what the Chaudoir framework includes is attributed to a different citation, [35]. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Butler M Guidelines for feminist therapy In: Rosewater LB, Walker L, editors. Handbook of feminist therapy 1985 New York, NY Springer 2 38
  2. [36]Gray J Elements of a two-process theory of learning 1975 New York, NY Academic Press 426

Authors
Naved, R. T., Rimi, N. A., Jahan, S., & Lindmark, G.
Affiliations
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Naved, Ruchira T
Venue
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
Published
2009-09-16
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
477-91
ISSN
1606-0997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003510015
Cited by
32
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Population and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • Bioline International (Bioline International) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
  • UNICEF
  • Australian Agency for International Development
  • Department for International Development
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Uppsala Universitet
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
paramedics, mental health counseling, domestic violence, battered women, rural Bangladesh, community mental health services, women's self-confidence, participant perceptions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Allied Health Personnel, Bangladesh, Counseling, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Mental Health Services, Rural Population, Program Evaluation, Logistic Models, Women's Health, Patient Satisfaction, Battered Women, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review