Cited by 4Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionOvarian function and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quality of Life among Infertile Women Attending an Infertility Treatment Center, Kathmandu

Open access
Pradhan Shrestha, Subhadra, Bhandari, Sushila Devi, Pradhan, Sushaili·2020·Journal of Nepal Health Research Council

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The problem of infertility is an increasing issue worldwide, among married reproductive age couples, particularly women. Infertility can affect every aspect of quality of life among infertile women. This study aimed to assess the quality of life of infertile women attending an infertility treatment center. METHODS: A crossectional study of 385 infertile women age 25-50 years attending an infertility treatment center was carried out from 8th July 2018 to 4th January 2019. Data were collected using the Short Form Health Survey (Rand SF-36), containing 36 questions by interview technique and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: The higher proportion (63.38%) of primary infertility was involved in this study compared to secondary infertility without baby (24.93%) and with the baby (11.69%). More than half (54.5%) of infertile women had low-level quality of life whereas 45.5% of them had a high level of quality of life. The mean scores of quality of life subscales were not significantly different between primary and secondary infertility (p-value >0.05). There was no statistically significant association between socio-demographic variables and quality of life of primary and secondary infertility (p-value >0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the duration of infertility and quality of life of primary and secondary infertility with baby (p-value 0.020), and between the reason of infertility and quality of life of secondary infertility without a baby (p-value 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of infertile women had low-level quality of life. Therefore, it is necessary to provide them information, education, and counseling regarding infertility.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i3.2639

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pradhan Shrestha, S., Bhandari, S. D., & Pradhan, S.
Venue
Journal of Nepal Health Research Council
Published
2020-11-13
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
394-400
ISSN
  • 1727-5482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1999-6217
OpenAlex
W3103784766
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nepal Health Research Council (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
infertility, quality of life, infertile women, primary infertility, secondary infertility, infertility duration, sociodemographic factors, infertility counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Middle Aged, Nepal, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review