Cited by 3Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Major Issues in the Study of Ancient Egyptian Religion

Open access
PODEMANN SØRENSEN, JØRGEN·1994·Temenos - Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion

Abstract

No abstract available

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33356/temenos.6054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
PODEMANN SØRENSEN, J.
Venue
Temenos - Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion
Publisher
Temenos
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
30
ISSN
  • 0497-1817 (ISSN-L)
  • 2342-7256
OpenAlex
W2128155266
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Temenos - Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
ancient Egyptian religion, Egyptian mythology, religious studies methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major Issues in the Study of Ancient Egyptian Religion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.33356/temenos.6054
The paper
PODEMANN SØRENSEN, J. (1994). Major Issues in the Study of Ancient Egyptian Religion. Temenos - Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.6054