Cited by 7Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Lateral geniculate body evoked potentials elicited by visual and electrical stimulation

Open access
Choi, Chang Wook, Kim, Pan Sang, Shin, Sun Ae, Yang, Ji Yeon, Yang, Yun Sik·2014·Korean Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Blind individuals who have photoreceptor loss are known to perceive phosphenes with electrical stimulation of their remaining retinal ganglion cells. We proposed that implantable lateral geniculate body (LGB) stimulus electrode arrays could be used to generate phosphene vision. We attempted to refine the basic reference of the electrical evoked potentials (EEPs) elicited by microelectrical stimulations of the optic nerve, optic tract and LGB of a domestic pig, and then compared it to visual evoked potentials (VEPs) elicited by short-flash stimuli. METHODS: For visual function measurement, VEPs in response to short-flash stimuli on the left eye of the domestic pig were assessed over the visual cortex at position Oz with the reference electrode at Fz. After anesthesia, linearly configured platinum wire electrodes were inserted into the optic nerve, optic track and LGB. To determine the optimal stimulus current, EEPs were recorded repeatedly with controlling the pulse and power. The threshold of current and charge density to elicit EEPs at 0.3 ms pulse duration was about ±10 µA. RESULTS: Our experimental results showed that visual cortex activity can be effectively evoked by stimulation of the optic nerve, optic tract and LGB using penetrating electrodes. The latency of P1 was more shortened as the electrical stimulation was closer to LGB. The EEPs of two-channel in the visual cortex demonstrated a similar pattern with stimulation of different spots of the stimulating electrodes. We found that the LGB-stimulated EEP pattern was very similar to the simultaneously generated VEP on the control side, although implicit time deferred. CONCLUSIONS: EEPs and VEPs derived from visual-system stimulation were compared. The LGB-stimulated EEP wave demonstrated a similar pattern to the VEP waveform except implicit time, indicating prosthetic-based electrical stimulation of the LGB could be utilized for the blind to perceive vision of phosphenes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.4.337

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • So far, there have been very few preclinical studies in animals conducted to test the stimulation efficacy of LGN prostheses.

    “So far, there have been very few preclinical studies in animals conducted to test the stimulation efficacy [81,83,84].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 7

Authors
Choi, C. W., Kim, P. S., Shin, S. A., Yang, J. Y., & Yang, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • Wonkwang University Hospital (KR)
  • Hanson Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yun Sik
Venue
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2014
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
337
ISSN
  • 1011-8942 (ISSN-L)
  • 2092-9382
OpenAlex
W2109152054
Cited by
7
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wonkwang University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
lateral geniculate nucleus, visual evoked potentials, phosphenes, retinal prosthesis, optic nerve stimulation, optic tract stimulation, platinum wire electrode, porcine model, visual cortex, stimulation threshold
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Geniculate Bodies, Male, Optic Nerve, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Sus scrofa, Optic Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review