Cited by 28Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Factors associated with treatment outcomes in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for panic disorder

Open access
Kim, Borah, Cho, Sung Joon, Lee, Kang Soo, Lee, Jun-Yeob, Choe, Ah Young, Lee, Ji Eun, Choi, Tai Kiu, Lee, Sang-Hyuk·2013·Yonsei Medical Journal

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although the effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for panic disorder (PD) has been studied previously, data on the predictors of treatment outcomes in MBCT for PD are scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with PD were screened to analyze treatment outcomes such as MBCT completion, treatment response, and remission after undergoing MBCT for PD. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid personality disorders, and baseline medication doses were examined. The study administered the Panic Disorder Severity Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Anxiety Sensitivity Inventory-Revised to patients at baseline and at eight weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were enrolled in the present study. Comorbid personality disorder was significantly associated with MBCT non-completion. We found that anxiety sensitivity (AS) improvement after an eight week MBCT program was a statistically significant factor associated with treatment response. Using logistic regression analysis, AS improvement after MBCT showed significant association with PD remission after MBCT. CONCLUSION: Comorbid personality disorders of participants could be a potential predictor of MBCT non-completion. Furthermore, AS improvement after MBCT may predict treatment response and remission after MBCT for PD. However, better designed studies with a larger number of patients are needed to confirm our findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.6.1454

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment response and remission after MBCT could be predicted by enhanced anxiety sensitivity.

    “Likewise, treatment response and remission after MBCT could be predicted by enhanced anxiety sensitivity.19”

    From Mindfulness in mood and anxiety disorders: A review of the literature (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results (Treatment response and Remission) associate response and remission with greater improvement in anxiety sensitivity, not enhanced anxiety sensitivity. The Assessments section defines improvement as a reduction in ASI-R score from baseline, so the claim reverses the direction of the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The presence of comorbid personality disorders predicted non-completion of MBCT for panic disorders.

    “According to the study, the presence of comorbid personality disorders predicted the non-completion of MBCT for panic disorders.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID) Washington, D.C. American Psychiatric Press, Inc. 1996

Authors
Kim, B., Cho, S. J., Lee, K. S., Lee, J.-Y., Choe, A. Y., Lee, J. E., Choi, T. K., & Lee, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
  • CHA University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Sang-Hyuk
Venue
Yonsei Medical Journal
Publisher
XMLink
Published
2013
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1454
ISSN
  • 0513-5796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-2437
OpenAlex
W2019910195
Cited by
28
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Yonsei Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2011-0023359)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, panic disorder, predictors of treatment outcome, treatment response, remission, treatment completion, comorbid personality disorders, anxiety sensitivity, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review