The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug induced liver injury: East versus West – a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Drug induced liver injury (DILI) may be different in the East compared to the West due to differing disease prevalence, prescribing patterns and pharmacogenetic profiles. To review existing literature on causative agents of DILI in the East compared to the West, a comprehensive literature search was performed on electronic databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure without language restrictions. Studies which involve patients having DILI and reported the frequency of causative agents were included. A random effects model was applied to synthesize the current evidence using prevalence of class-specific and agent-specific causative drugs with 95% confidence intervals. Of 6,914 articles found, 12 showed the distribution of drugs implicated in DILI in the East with a total of 33,294 patients and 16 in the West with a total of 26,069 DILI cases. In the East, the most common agents by class were anti-tuberculosis drugs (26.6%), herbal and alternative medications (25.3%), and antibiotics (15.7%), while in the West, antibiotics (34.9%), cardiovascular agents (17.3%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (12.5%) were the commonest. For individual agents, the most common agents in the East were isoniazid-rifampicin-pyrazinamide (25.4%), phenytoin (3.5%), and cephalosporin (2.9%) while in the West, amoxicillin-potassium clavulanate combination acid (11.3%), nimesulide (6.3%), and ibuprofen (6.1%) were the commonest. There was significant heterogeneity due to variability in single-centre compared to multi-centre studies. Differences in DILI in the East versus the West both in drug classes and individual agents are important for clinicians to recognize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The drugs that cause liver injury vary across countries and regions owing to the epidemiology of the primary disease, variations in prescribing habits, and population heterogeneity.
“The drugs that cause liver injury vary across countries and regions owing to the epidemiology of the primary disease, variations in prescribing habits, and population heterogeneity [15].”
From Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Björnsson, E. S., Bergmann, O. M., Björnsson, H. K., Kvaran, R. B., & Olafsson, S. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.006 · Cited by 865
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.22 · DOI
- 10.1002/pds.1211 · DOI
- 10.1053/jhep.2002.34857 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2012.138 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphar.2015.00072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01461.x · DOI
- 10.2165/00002018-200932010-00005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0047769 · DOI
- 10.1111/liv.13662 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0080991 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms17030313 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03117.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02133.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00231-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10620-008-0250-x · DOI
- 10.1097/01.meg.0000250581.77865.68 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00228-004-0888-z · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03338.x · DOI
- 10.1111/jcpt.12039 · DOI
- Galan, 2005, The burden of acute nonfulminant drug-induced hepatitis in a United States tertiary referral center [corrected], 64
- 10.1007/s40264-017-0547-9 · DOI
- 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.3.268 · DOI
- 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835f6889 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40064-015-1600-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00486.x · DOI · Paper page
- Sobhonslidsuk, 2016, The incidence, outcomes and cost of drug-induced liver injury from a national database in Thailand, S460
- 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.149 · DOI
- Bektas, 2008, Drug induced liver injury: a single center experience over a 7- year period, 475A
- 10.4103/1947-2714.93385 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2010.287 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drug induced liver injury – a 2023 update
Allison, R., Guraka, A., Shawa, I. T., Tripathi, G., Moritz, W., & Kermanizadeh, A. (2023) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2023.2261848 · Cited by 167
Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update
Mao, Y., Ma, S., Liu, C., Liu, X., Su, M., Li, D., Li, Y., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, J., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10633-7 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Low, E. X. S., Zheng, Q., Chan, E., & Lim, S. G.
- Venue
- Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-154
- ISSN
- 2287-2728
- 2287-285X
- PMC
- PMC7160354
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review