The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toxic hepatitis associated with Polygoni multiflori
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kim et al., Bae et al., Yang et al., Jung et al., Kim et al., and Woo et al. all provided cases limited to a probable or highly probable causality grading, suggesting complete case data sets or prospective data collection in single case reports.
“and by Kim et al.,45 Bae et al.,46 Yang et al.,47 Jung et al.,48 Kim et al.,49 and Woo et al.,53 who all provided cases limited to a probable or highly probable causality grading, suggesting complete case data sets or prospective data collection in single case reports.”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
It seems that most Korean reports followed a retrospective study approach.
“It seems that most reports followed a retrospective study approach (Table 1),40–54”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
First authors of reports from Korea contributed as experts were numbered overall 15, and thereby represented a substantial number of publications on 526 HILI cases that had been assessed for causality using RUCAM.
“First authors of reports from Korea contributed as experts were numbered overall 15, and thereby represented a substantial number of publications on 526 HILI cases that had been assessed for causality using RUCAM (Table 1).40–54”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Cho, 1999, Korean J Med, 56, 753
- Benchou, 1990, J Hepatol, 11, 272, 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-A · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 2009, Korean J Gastroenterol, 53, 5
- Son, 2006, Korea J Hepatol, 12, 103
- Lee, 2003, Korean J Med, 65, 689
- Farnsworth, 1985, Bull Wold Health Organ, 63, 965
- Yoo, 2007, Korean J Hepatol, 13, 34
- Vicker, 1999, BMJ, 319, 1050, 10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1050 · DOI
- Larrey, 1997, J Hepatol, 26, 47, 10.1016/S0168-8278(97)82333-1 · DOI
- But, 1996, Vet Human Toxicol, 38, 280
- Ahn, 2005, Hepatitis, 321
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teschke, R., Zhu, Y., & Jing, J. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology · doi:10.14218/jcth.2020.00009 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Bae, S. H., Kim, D. H., Bae, Y. S., Lee, K. J., Kim, D. W., Yoon, J. B., Hong, J. H., & Kim, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Internal Medicine Good Samsun Hospital, Korea.
- Venue
- The Korean Journal of Hepatology
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182
- ISSN
- 1738-222X
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- ko
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
