The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discharge of nutrient wastes from salmon farms: environmental effects, and potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture
Open accessAbstract
We quantified release rates of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) waste from Norwegian salmon farms in 2009 in order to evaluate the theoretical environmental influence on surrounding waters and the potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) driven by salmon aquaculture.Of the total feed input, 70% C, 62% N and 70% P were released into the environment, equivalent to an annual discharge of about 404 000, 50 600 and 9400 t of C, N and P, respectively, based on total salmon production of 1.02 × 10 6 t.We predicted that 48% of feed C was respired as CO 2 , 45% of feed N was excreted as dissolved inorganic N (DIN), and 18% of feed P was excreted as dissolved inorganic P (DIP).Approximately 44% of feed P was released as particles, dominating solid wastes.The mean food conversion ratio (feed supplied per fish produced) of Norwegian salmon farms was 1.16 ± 0.08 SE in 2009.Estimates of the potential for IMTA driven by salmon farming showed a far higher potential for seaweed production based on the released DIN than for mussel production based on released appropriately sized particulate organic carbon (POC).The daily volumetric loading rates of DIN from salmon farms (range for counties: 40 to 501 µg N m -3 d -1 ) were <15% of the natural loading rate of nitrate from deep water, suggesting that the nutrient loading rate is within safe limits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Troell, M., Joyce, A., Chopin, T., Neori, A., Buschmann, A. H., & Fang, J.-G. (2009) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.09.010 · Cited by 689
Cited by
Environmental issues in Chilean salmon farming: a review
Quiñones, R. A., Fuentes, M., Montes, R. M., Soto, D., & León‐Muñoz, J. (2019) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12337 · Cited by 298
Seaweed aquaculture in Norway: recent industrial developments and future perspectives.
Stévant, P., Rebours, C., & Chapman, A. (2017) · Aquaculture International · doi:10.1007/s10499-017-0120-7 · Cited by 261
Handå, A., Forbord, S., Wang, X., Broch, O. J., Dahle, S. W., Størseth, T. R., Reitan, K. I., Olsen, Y., & Skjermo, J. (2013) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.08.006 · Cited by 182
Self-citationMarinho, G. S., Holdt, S. L., Birkeland, M. J., & Angelidaki, I. (2015) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-014-0519-8 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Olsen, L., Reitan, K., & Olsen, Y.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Environment Interactions
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2012-08-23
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-283
- ISSN
- 1869-215X (ISSN-L)
- 1869-7534
- OpenAlex
- W2318479627
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discharge of nutrient wastes from salmon farms: environmental effects, and potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/aei00044
- The paper
- Wang, X., Olsen, L., Reitan, K., & Olsen, Y. (2012). Discharge of nutrient wastes from salmon farms: environmental effects, and potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Aquaculture Environment Interactions. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.