Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global phylogenetic community structure and β-diversity patterns in surface bacterioplankton metacommunities

Open access
Barberán, A, Casamayor, EO·2010·Aquatic Microbial Ecology

Abstract

We aimed to identify phylogenetic community patterns in abundant planktonic bacteria (Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Bacteroidetes) from a worldwide range of surface waters (lakes and seas -34 sites and ca.4500 16S rRNA gene sequences).At each site we assessed the number of observed bacterial groups and the genetic relatedness of the most abundant groups through a community phylogenetic metaanalysis approach in order to (1) explore which potential ecological processes were consistent with the observed phylogenetic patterns in community assembly and (2) disentangle the effects of space and environment in β-diversity patterns for the different bacterial groups.Inland waters had significantly more bacterial groups and were more diverse than marine waters.Marine habitats showed a higher percentage of clustered sites than lakes, and bacterial communities were more closely related than expected by chance.Phylogenetic β-diversity analyses revealed different patterns to both salt composition (marine vs. inland salt lakes) and salt concentration for the dominant bacteria.We observed that while β-diversity patterns for Bacteroidetes were mostly shaped by salinity concentration, patterns in Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were controlled by salt composition.Actinobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Sphingobacteria were largely absent from marine habitats and from saline continental sites.In general and despite the lack of contextual metadata, environmental similarity was more relevant than spatial distribution for bacterial β-diversity patterns.However, we detected a geographic signal for some inland waters' groups (i.e.Actinobacteria, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria). Overall, the analyses indicated differences among phylogenetic groups and reflected patterns upon which further exploration of community assembly theory could be based.Marine (background) and freshwater (inset) bacterioplankton look similar under the microscope but present very different dominant bacteria.The ecological drivers guiding assemblage composition are, however, intriguing and challenging for microbial ecologists today.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/ame01389

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Barberán, A., & Casamayor, E.
Venue
Aquatic Microbial Ecology
Published
2010-03-11
Volume
59
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0948-3055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1564
OpenAlex
W1990826281
Cited by
204
References
2
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global phylogenetic community structure and β-diversity patterns in surface bacterioplankton metacommunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/ame01389
The paper
Barberán, A., & Casamayor, E. (2010). Global phylogenetic community structure and β-diversity patterns in surface bacterioplankton metacommunities. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01389

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.