The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of SYBR Green I for rapid epifluorescence counts of marine viruses and bacteria
Open accessAbstract
A new nucleic acid stain, SYBR Green I, can be used for the rapid and accurate determination of viral and bacterial abundances in diverse marine samples.We tested this stain with formalinpreserved samples of coastal water and also from depth profiles (to 800 m) from sites 19 and 190 km offshore, by filtering a few m1 onto 0.02 pm pore-size filters and staining for 15 min.Comparison of bacterial counts to those made with acridine orange (AO) and virus counts with those made by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed very strong correlations.Bacterial counts with A 0 and SYBR Green 1 were indistinguishable and almost perfectly correlated (r2 = 0.99).Virus counts ranged widely, from 0.03 to 15 X 10' virus ml-l.Virus counts by SYBR Green 1 were on the average higher than those made by TEM, and a SYBR Green 1 versus TEM plot yielded a regression slope of 1.28.The correlation between the two was very high with an value of 0.98.The precision of the SYBR Green I method was the same as that for TEM, with coefficients of variation of 2.9%.SYBR Green I stained viruses and bacteria are intensely stained and easy to distinguish from other particles with both older and newer generation epifluorescence microscopes.Detritus is generally not stained, unlike when the alternative dye YoPro I is used, so this approach may be suitable for sediments.SYBR Green I stained samples need no desalting or heating, can be fixed with formalin prior to filtration, the optimal staining time is 15 min (resulting in a total preparation time of less than 25 min), and counts can be easily performed at sea immediately after sampling.This method may facilitate incorporation of viral research into most aquatic microbiology laboratories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Thingstad, T. F. (2000) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2000.45.6.1320 · Cited by 1,021
Santoro, A. E., Francis, C. A., De Sieyes, N. R., & Boehm, A. B. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01547.x · Cited by 355
Pride, D. T., Salzman, J., Haynes, M., Rohwer, F., Davis-Long, C., White, R. A., Loomer, P., Armitage, G. C., & Relman, D. A. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.169 · Cited by 335
Freshwater and marine virioplankton: a brief overview of commonalities and differences
WILHELM, S. W., & MATTESON, A. R. (2008) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01980.x · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Noble, R., & Fuhrman, J.
- Venue
- Aquatic Microbial Ecology
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 113-118
- ISSN
- 0948-3055 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1564
- OpenAlex
- W2022388889
- Cited by
- 974
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of SYBR Green I for rapid epifluorescence counts of marine viruses and bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/ame014113
- The paper
- Noble, R., & Fuhrman, J. (1998). Use of SYBR Green I for rapid epifluorescence counts of marine viruses and bacteria. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame014113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.