The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers
Open accessAbstract
In order to identify patterns in bacterial community composition in freshwater habitats, we analyzed the available database of 16S rDNA sequences from freshwater plankton, including 24 new sequences from Parker River (Massachusetts, USA), 42 from Lake Soyang (South Korea) and 148 from Lake IJssel (The Netherlands).At this point, combined diversity studies using random cloning have deposited 689 bacterial and 75 plastid 16S rDNA sequences from the water column of rivers and lakes in North America, Europe and Asia.Systematic comparisons with the global database showed that the majority of the bacterial sequences were most closely related to other freshwater clones or isolates, while relatively few were closest to sequences recovered from soils or marine habitats.This habitat-specific clustering suggests that the clustered 16S rDNA sequences represent species or groups of species that are indigenous to freshwater.We have discerned 34 phylogenetic clusters of closely related sequences that are either restricted to freshwater or dominated by freshwater sequences.Of these clusters, 23 contained no cultivated organisms.These putative freshwater clusters were found among the alpha-, beta-and gamma-Proteobacteria, the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides group, the Cyanobacteria, the Actinobacteria, the Verrucomicrobia, the green non-sulfur bacteria and candidate division OP10.This study shows that rivers and lakes have a specific planktonic bacterial community distinct from bacteria in neighboring environments such as soil and sediments.It also points out that these planktonic bacteria are distributed in diverse freshwater ecosystems around the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
The Uncultured Microbial Majority
Rappé, M. S., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 · Cited by 2,017
Hahn, M. W., Lünsdorf, H., Wu, Q., Schauer, M., Höfle, M. G., Boenigk, J., & Stadler, P. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.3.1442-1451.2003 · Cited by 284
Wu, Q. L., & Hahn, M. W. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00105.x · Cited by 272
Edwards, J. E., Huws, S. A., Kim, E. J., & Kingston-Smith, A. H. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00392.x · Cited by 103
Antibiotics promote aggregation within aquatic bacterial communities
Corno, G., Coci, M., Giardina, M., Plechuk, S., Campanile, F., & Stefani, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00297 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Zwart, G., Crump, B., Kamst-van Agterveld, M., Hagen, F., & Han, S.
- Venue
- Aquatic Microbial Ecology
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 141-155
- ISSN
- 0948-3055 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1564
- OpenAlex
- W2138708832
- Cited by
- 888
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/ame028141
- The paper
- Zwart, G., Crump, B., Kamst-van Agterveld, M., Hagen, F., & Han, S. (2002). Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame028141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.