The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public perceptions of global warming: United States and internation perspectives
Open accessAbstract
National and international survey data on global warming are summarized in terms of levels of awareness, actual knowledge, degree of concern, perceived risk, and willingness to pay or sacrifice to mitigate or adapt to potential negative impacts.The data indicate the following: solid awareness of and support for general environmental goals; an awareness of and concern for global warming; a flawed understanding of global warming that is the result of an inappropriate application of a general pollution model; considerable perceived threat from global warming but less so than for most other issues; and a limited willingness to sacrifice to better cope with global warming.Although global warming generates concern around the globe, it is not a 'front-burner' issue.Concern tends to be highest in Canada, most of Europe and South America.Errors in assessing causes of global warming are global in nature.International data demonstrates considerable support for economic sacrifices to deal with environmental problems, including global warming.Our own data support but go beyond earlier data by implying that global warming is not a salient issue, and that people across the globe will support global climate change initiatives that do not levy unusual hardships; but they cannot be expected to voluntarily alter their lifestyles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Cited by
The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks
Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1080 · Cited by 680
In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?
Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301 · Cited by 624
Self-citationSupport for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*
Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1526/003601107781170026 · Cited by 580
Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming
Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547004270234 · Cited by 432
Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074708 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Bord, R., Fisher, A., & O'Connor, R.
- Venue
- Climate Research
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 75-84
- ISSN
- 0936-577X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1572
- OpenAlex
- W1964598772
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public perceptions of global warming: United States and internation perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/cr011075
- The paper
- Bord, R., Fisher, A., & O'Connor, R. (1998). Public perceptions of global warming: United States and internation perspectives. Climate Research. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr011075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.