The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction
Open accessAbstract
ESR Endangered Species Research Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials ESR 10:1-7 (2010) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00269 Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction Steven J. Bograd1,*, Barbara A. Block2, Daniel P. Costa3, Brendan J. Godley4 1NOAA, NMFS Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Environmental Research Division, 1352 Lighthouse Ave., Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA 2Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA 3Dept. of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California at Santa Cruz, 100 Shaffer Rd., Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA 4Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK *Email: steven.bograd@noaa.gov ABSTRACT: Biologging technology allows researchers to take measurements from free-ranging animals as they move undisturbed through their environment. Recent advances in biologging technology, including electronic tag miniaturization and improved animal movement models, have revolutionized our understanding of the ecology of top predators and have permitted observations well beyond the reach of standard measurement techniques. Engineering has provided the biologging community with ever more sophisticated tags, and advances in the application of statistical methods to interpret these data have yielded powerful new tools for understanding animal behavior. The technology has also reached sufficient sophistication and reliability such that the data collected is often equivalent to industry standards for environmental sampling, which has led to profound advancements in the marine realm, where the sheer vastness, in 3 dimensions, limits our ability to observe. Biologging data is now being increasingly applied to marine management and conservation policy. In this introduction, we highlight a few of the research themes presented at the Third International Conference on Biologging Science, and comment on the future challenges of biologging science. KEY WORDS: Biologging · Telemetry · Tagging technologies · Animal movement · Environmental sensors · Oceanography · Conservation Full text in pdf format NextCite this article as: Bograd SJ, Block BA, Costa DP, Godley BJ (2010) Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction. Endang Species Res 10:1-7. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00269Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in ESR Vol. 10. Online publication date: March 03, 2010 Print ISSN: 1863-5407; Online ISSN: 1613-4796 Copyright © 2010 Inter-Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WILSON, R. P., WHITE, C. R., QUINTANA, F., HALSEY, L. G., LIEBSCH, N., MARTIN, G. R., & BUTLER, P. J. (2006) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01127.x · Cited by 797
Teo, S. L. H., Boustany, A., Dewar, H., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Weng, K. C., Beemer, S., Seitz, A. C., Farwell, C. J., Prince, E. D., & Block, B. A. (2007) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0447-5 · Cited by 226 · cited 1×
“TAG is a long-term electronic tag study of Atlantic bluefin tuna that has led to new insights into the distribution, movements and population structure of this overexploited species (Block et al. 1998, 2001, Block 2005, Teo et al. 2007, Walli et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWalli, A., Teo, S. L. H., Boustany, A., Farwell, C. J., Williams, T., Dewar, H., Prince, E., & Block, B. A. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006151 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Cited by
Marine top predators as climate and ecosystem sentinels
Hazen, E. L., Abrahms, B., Brodie, S., Carroll, G., Jacox, M. G., Savoca, M. S., Scales, K. L., Sydeman, W. J., & Bograd, S. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2125 · Cited by 437
Self-citationLewison, R., Hobday, A. J., Maxwell, S., Hazen, E., Hartog, J. R., Dunn, D. C., Briscoe, D., Fossette, S., O'Keefe, C. E., Barnes, M., et al. (2015) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv018 · Cited by 249
Self-citationUnnithan Kumar, S., Turnbull, J., Hartman Davies, O., Hodgetts, T., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-022-01504-x · Cited by 71
Nicol, S. J., Allain, V., Pilling, G. M., Polovina, J., Coll, M., Bell, J., Dalzell, P., Sharples, P., Olson, R., Griffiths, S., et al. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0598-y · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Bograd, S., Block, B., Costa, D., & Godley, B.
- Venue
- Endangered Species Research
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2010-03-03
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 1613-4796 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-5407
- OpenAlex
- W2047005779
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/esr00269
- The paper
- Bograd, S., Block, B., Costa, D., & Godley, B. (2010). Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction. Endangered Species Research. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.