The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phytoplankton-bacteria interactions: an apparant paradox? Analysis of a model system with both competition and commensalism
Open accessAbstract
Mineral nutrient limitation seems to stimulate phytoplankton excretion of extracellular organic carbon (EOC).Bacterial growth on EOC requires additional uptake of mineral nutrients.A paradoxical situation is thereby created: algae stressed by lack of mineral nutrients respond in a manner whereby they stimulate their competitors for the lacking nutrients.To investigate this paradoxical ecological relation, a simple mathematical model was analysed and compared to a biological model system.The biological model system consisted of the diatom Skeletonema costaturn and a strain of a marine bacterium cultured together in chemostats with phosphate as the limiting mineral nutrient.Increasing mineral nutrient limitation by decreasing dilution rate resulted in chemostat equilibria with more bacteria and less algae, confirming the proposed paradox.In a certain sense, algae outcompeted themselves at low dilution rates.Predictions of the simple mathematical model were found to be in agreement both with observed distribution of phosphorus between the 2 populations and w ~t h amount of algal carbon biomass in the mixed culture.Implications of results for natural aquatic ecosystems are briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Algae-bacteria interactions: Evolution, ecology and emerging applications
Ramanan, R., Kim, B.-H., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2016) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003 · Cited by 1,301
Mixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters
Burkholder, J. M., Glibert, P. M., & Skelton, H. M. (2008) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.010 · Cited by 590
Production and Removal Processes
Carlson, C. A. (2002) · Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter · doi:10.1016/b978-012323841-2/50006-3 · Cited by 454
The influence of humic substances on lacustrine planktonic food chains
Jones, R. I. (1992) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00006992 · Cited by 363
Bacterioplankton Roles in Cycling of Organic Matter: The Microbial Food Web
Fuhrman, J. (1992) · Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0762-2_20 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Bratbak, G., & Thingstad, T.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 23-30
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W1974767292
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoplankton-bacteria interactions: an apparant paradox? Analysis of a model system with both competition and commensalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps025023
- The paper
- Bratbak, G., & Thingstad, T. (1985). Phytoplankton-bacteria interactions: an apparant paradox? Analysis of a model system with both competition and commensalism. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps025023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.