The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton
Open accessAbstract
A basic tenet of nitrogen utilization in phytoplankton is that ammoniuln inhibits nitrate uptake.Consequently, it is generally believed that little or no nitrate uptake occurs at ammonium concentrations above ca 1 yM.A thorough review of field studies shows that the reduction of nitrate uptake rate in the presence of ammonium is rarely so severe, and that it is a highly variable phenomenon.To simplify quantification of the interaction between nitrate and ammonium uptake, it is proposed that it be divided into an indirect interaction, preference, and a direct effect, inhibition.In order to determine preference and inhibition it is necessary to measure uptake of each inorganic nitrogen source alone and in the presence of increasing concentrations of the other nitrogen source.Preference for ammonium uptake is manifested primarily in a higher V,,,,, and lower K, for ammonium uptake than for nitrate uptake and is accentuated by low light and low nitrogen availability.However, although ammonium is the preferred nitrogen source for uptake, growth rates on nitrate usually equal or exceed those on ammonium.Inhibition of nitrate uptake by ammonium is much more variable, but when separated from preference is less extreme.It is also enhanced by low light, but unlike preference, i t is greater when phytoplankton are N sufficient.Species differences are apparent for both preference and inhibition, but there are only enough data for preference to determine how it varies among algal groups.Finally, there are reports of low concentrations of ammonium stimulating nitrate uptake and of nitrate inhibiting ammonium uptake.Such unexpected interactions along with variations in preference and inhibition with species composition and environmental conditions may account for the variability observed in field studies and will not be explainable or predictable until more is known about the underlying biochemical mechanisms.Even though it is not possible at present to model nitrate uptake accurately because of uncertainty about the interaction between ammonluln and nitrate uptake, it is quite evident that the simplistic view that nitrate uptake is reduced to zero if ammonium exceeds 1 1iM would often result in large underestimates of nitrate uptake and new production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sajjadi, B., Chen, W.-Y., Raman, A. A. A., & Ibrahim, S. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.050 · Cited by 535
Chai, F., Dugdale, R. C., Peng, T.-H., Wilkerson, F. P., & Barber, R. T. (2002) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0967-0645(02)00055-3 · Cited by 295
Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen: Implications for nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters
Paerl, H. W., Dennis, R. L., & Whitall, D. R. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804899 · Cited by 295
The role of ammonium and nitrate in spring bloom development in San Francisco Bay
Dugdale, R. C., Wilkerson, F. P., Hogue, V. E., & Marchi, A. (2007) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.12.008 · Cited by 257
ARE RIVERS JUST BIG STREAMS? A PULSE METHOD TO QUANTIFY NITROGEN DEMAND IN A LARGE RIVER
Tank, J. L., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Baker, M. A., & Hall, R. O. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1315.1 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Dortch, Q.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 183-201
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W1973259369
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps061183
- The paper
- Dortch, Q. (1990). The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps061183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.