The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents evidence of a seasonal shift from P to N as the nutrient limiting the accumulation of algal biomass in Chesapeake Bay.Following the winter/spring maximum in freshwater runoff, (1) the ratio of dissolved inorganic nitrogen to soluble reactive phosphorus (DIN/PO,) was greater than the N/P of algal biomass; (2) alkaline phosphatase activity was high; (3) phosphate turnover times were short; (4) ammonium turnover times were long; and (5) growth rates of phytoplankton were stimulated by additions of phosphate but not by additions of ammonium or silicate.During the period of low runoff in summer, all indicators reversed, and N limited algal growth rates.Silicate concentrations also showed evidence of biological depletion in spring, which may have limited diatom abundance.Due to the concordance of all indicators at large and small scales, we argue that phytoplankton growth rates exert primary control over biomass accumulation.We conclude that P and Si limit the accumulation of algal biomass along the major axis of Chesapeake Bay in spring, whereas N limits algal accumulation in summer, similar to the conclusions of D'Elia et al. (1986; Can.J. Fish.Aquat.Sci.43: 397-406) for the Patuxent subestuary.Controlling eutrophication of the Bay and its subestuaries will require basin-specific management practices for both N and P reductions in influent waters.Such management efforts will provlde ecosystem tests of nutrient hmitation on a scale similar to those successfully conducted in lakes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences
Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., & Burkholder, J. M. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804901 · Cited by 2,965
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions.
Kemp, W., Boynton, W., Adolf, J., Boesch, D., Boicourt, W., Brush, G., Cornwell, J., Fisher, T., Glibert, P., Hagy, J., et al. (2005) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps303001 · Cited by 1,468
Self-citationHagy, J. D., Boynton, W. R., Keefe, C. W., & Wood, K. V. (2004) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02907650 · Cited by 623
Ruttenberg, K. C. (2003) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/08153-6 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, T., Peele, E., Ammerman, J., & Harding, L.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 51-63
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2028686497
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps082051
- The paper
- Fisher, T., Peele, E., Ammerman, J., & Harding, L. (1992). Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps082051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.