The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seascape ecology of coastal biogenic habitats: advances, gaps, and challenges
Abstract
We review the progress made in the emerging field of coastal seascape ecology, i.e. the application of landscape ecology concepts and techniques to the coastal marine environment. Since the early 1990s, the landscape ecology approach has been applied in several coastal subtidal and intertidal biogenic habitats across a range of spatial scales. Emerging evidence indicates that animals in theseseascapes respond to the structure of patches and patch mosaics in different ways and at different spatial scales, yet we still know very little about the ecological significance of these relationships and the consequences of change in seascape patterning for ecosystem functioning and overall biodiversity. Ecological interactions that occur within patches and among different types of patches (or seascapes) are likely to be critically important in maintaining primary and secondary production, trophic transfer, biodiversity, coastal protection, and supporting a wealth of ecosystem goods and services. We review faunal responses to patch and seascape structure, including effects of fragmentation on 5 focal habitats: seagrass meadows, salt marshes, coral reefs, mangrove forests, and oyster reefs. Extrapolating and generalizing spatial relationships between ecological patterns and processes across scales remains a significant challenge, and we show that there are major gaps in our understanding of these relationships. Filling these gaps will be crucial for managing and responding to an inevitably changing coastal environment. We show that critical ecological thresholds exist in the structural patterning of biogenic ecosystems that, when exceeded, cause abrupt shifts in the distribution and abundance of organisms. A better understanding of faunal–seascape relationships, including the identifications of threshold effects, is urgently needed to support the development of more effective and holistic management actions in restoration, site prioritization, and forecasting the impacts of environmental change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects
McGarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2002) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0335:ceoeat]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 731
Holland, A. F., Sanger, D. M., Gawle, C. P., Lerberg, S. B., Santiago, M. S., Riekerk, G. H. M., Zimmerman, L. E., & Scott, G. I. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(03)00357-5 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Nagelkerken, I., Sheaves, M., Baker, R., & Connolly, R. M. (2015) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12057 · Cited by 533
Arbeider, M., Sharpe, C., Carr-Harris, C., & Moore, J. (2019) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12896 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Boström, C., Pittman, S., Simenstad, C., & Kneib, R.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 427
- Pages
- 191-217
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2141724318
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seascape ecology of coastal biogenic habitats: advances, gaps, and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps09051
- The paper
- Boström, C., Pittman, S., Simenstad, C., & Kneib, R. (2011). Seascape ecology of coastal biogenic habitats: advances, gaps, and challenges. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.