The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps
Open accessAbstract
The field of marine tagging and tracking has grown rapidly in recent years as tag sizes have decreased and the diversity of sensors has increased.Tag data provide a unique view on individual movement patterns, at different scales than shipboard surveys, and have been used to discover new habitat areas, characterize oceanographic features, and delineate stock structures, among other purposes.Due to the necessity for small tag-to-body size ratio, tags have largely been deployed on adult animals, resulting in a relative paucity of data on earlier life history stages.In this study, we reviewed tagging efforts on multiple life history stages for seabirds, marine mammals, marine turtles, and fish and enumerated studies focusing on each guild that targeted larvae, juveniles or hatchlings.We found that turtles and fish had higher proportion of studies focusing on juveniles (> 20%) than seabirds and marine mammals (<10%).On both juveniles and adults, tags were used in a targeted manner with passive and transmitting tags as the main tools for population demography and connectivity studies, while GPS and archival tags were used more frequently for habitat analyses and foraging ecology.These findings identify the need to focus on novel approaches in tagging multiple life history stages both to study marine predator ecology and to effectively manage marine populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Larval Dispersal and Marine Population Connectivity
Cowen, R. K., & Sponaugle, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163757 · Cited by 2,077
Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic
Baum, J. K., Myers, R. A., Kehler, D. G., Worm, B., Harley, S. J., & Doherty, P. A. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079777 · Cited by 1,197
Cited by
Dynamic ocean management: defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean
Maxwell, S. M., Hazen, E. L., Lewison, R. L., Dunn, D. C., Bailey, H., Bograd, S. J., Briscoe, D. K., Fossette, S., Hobday, A. J., Bennett, M., et al. (2015) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.014 · Cited by 504
Self-citationMarine top predators as climate and ecosystem sentinels
Hazen, E. L., Abrahms, B., Brodie, S., Carroll, G., Jacox, M. G., Savoca, M. S., Scales, K. L., Sydeman, W. J., & Bograd, S. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2125 · Cited by 437
Self-citationLewison, R., Hobday, A. J., Maxwell, S., Hazen, E., Hartog, J. R., Dunn, D. C., Briscoe, D., Fossette, S., O'Keefe, C. E., Barnes, M., et al. (2015) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv018 · Cited by 249
Self-citationThe trophodynamics of marine top predators: Current knowledge, recent advances and challenges
Young, J. W., Hunt, B. P. V., Cook, T. R., Llopiz, J. K., Hazen, E. L., Pethybridge, H. R., Ceccarelli, D., Lorrain, A., Olson, R. J., Allain, V., et al. (2015) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.05.015 · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hazen, E., Maxwell, S., Bailey, H., Bograd, S., Hamann, M., Gaspar, P., Godley, B., & Shillinger, G.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2012-06-21
- Volume
- 457
- Pages
- 221-240
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2016640656
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps09857
- The paper
- Hazen, E., Maxwell, S., Bailey, H., Bograd, S., Hamann, M., Gaspar, P., Godley, B., & Shillinger, G. (2012). Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.