The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In situ grazing on plankton 10 µm by the boreal sponge Mycale lingua
Open accessAbstract
Ultraplankton, heterotrophic and autotrophic plankton c5 pm, are the most abundant food source in the world's oceans, yet their role as a food source for macroinvertebrates is largely unexamined.We quantified in situ feeding on heterotrophic and autotrophic plankton < l 0 pm by the boreal sponge Mycale l ~n g u a using measurements that quantified sponge feeding effic~enc~es, pumping rates, and abundance to determine the c o n t r ~b u t ~o n of plankton < l 0 pm to sponge carbon Intake.Using dualbeam flow cytometry we identified 5 populations of plankton c10 pm: heterotrophic bactena.Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus-type cyanobacteria, autotrophic eucaryotes <3 pm, and autotrophic eucaryotes 3 to 10 pm.Mycale lingua nonselectively grazed on all types of plankton < l 0 pm.Prochlorococcus was filtered with the highest efficiency (93%), followed by Synechococcus-type cyanobacteria (89%), autotrophic eucaryotes 3 to 10 I.lm (86":,), heterotrophic bacteria (74 %), and autotrophic eucaryotes c 3 pm (72%).We conservatively estimate that M. linqua at naturally occurring denslties can obtain 29 mg C d-' m-' feeding on plankton c10 pm, w ~t h 74% resulting from ultraplankton, suggestlng that ultraplankton are an important overlooked component of benthic-pelag~c coupling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prochlorococcus , a Marine Photosynthetic Prokaryote of Global Significance
Partensky, F., Hess, W. R., & Vaulot, D. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.1.106-127.1999 · Cited by 1,356
The functional roles of marine sponges
Bell, J. J. (2008) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.002 · Cited by 760
Genomic insights into the marine sponge microbiome
Hentschel, U., Piel, J., Degnan, S. M., & Taylor, M. W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2839 · Cited by 658
Do associated microbial abundances impact marine demosponge pumping rates and tissue densities?
Weisz, J. B., Lindquist, N., & Martens, C. S. (2008) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0910-0 · Cited by 309
Nutrient Fluxes Through Sponges
Maldonado, M., Ribes, M., & van Duyl, F. C. (2012) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394283-8.00003-5 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Pile, A., Patterson, M., & Witman, J.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 95-102
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2005741735
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ grazing on plankton 10 µm by the boreal sponge Mycale lingua. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps141095
- The paper
- Pile, A., Patterson, M., & Witman, J. (1996). In situ grazing on plankton 10 µm by the boreal sponge Mycale lingua. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps141095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.