Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae

Open access
Pedersen, MF, Borum, J·1996·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Nutrient enrichment of shallow coastal waters changes the composition of plant communities so that slow-growing, benthic macrophytes are replaced by fast-growing algae such as phytoplankton and ephemeral macroalgae.This scenario suggests that fast-growing algae suffer more from nutrient limitation than slow-growing algae at low nutrient availability.We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effect of in situ nutrient enrichment on the phytoplankton community, 4 ephemeral macroalgae (Ulva lactuca, Cladophora serica, Chaetomorpha linum and Ceramiurn rubrum) and 1 perennial macroalga (Fucus vesiculosus).Nitrogen was the main limiting nutrient to algal growth and fast-growing algae were N limited for a longer period during summer than slower-growing species.Differences in the temporal extent of N limitation were related to species-specific variations in N requirements for growth and in N storage pools.The N requirements per unit biomass and time were up to 30-fold higher for fast-growing algae compared to slow-growing species due to 10-fold faster growth and 3-fold higher demands for the internal N concentration needed to sustain maximum growth (i.e.critical concentrations).The pools of N reserves only varied 2-fold among algal species and could support maximum growth for 0.5 d in the phytoplankton community and for 12 d in E vesiculosus.Growth of phytoplankton and E vesiculosus could proceed at reduced rates for another 2.6 and 34 d.respectively, based on other internal pools of N. The results suggest that the species-specific differences in growth rate and critical N concentrations account for a substantial part of the variation in the duration of nutrient limitation among different algal types and, therefore, provide further clarification of the reasons why fast-growing algae are stimulated by increased nutrient availability while slowgrowing algae remain unaffected or are hampered due to shading.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps142261

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Pedersen, M., & Borum, J.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
1996
Volume
142
Pages
261-272
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2045410088
Cited by
484
References
0
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps142261
The paper
Pedersen, M., & Borum, J. (1996). Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps142261

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.