The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae
Open accessAbstract
Nutrient enrichment of shallow coastal waters changes the composition of plant communities so that slow-growing, benthic macrophytes are replaced by fast-growing algae such as phytoplankton and ephemeral macroalgae.This scenario suggests that fast-growing algae suffer more from nutrient limitation than slow-growing algae at low nutrient availability.We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effect of in situ nutrient enrichment on the phytoplankton community, 4 ephemeral macroalgae (Ulva lactuca, Cladophora serica, Chaetomorpha linum and Ceramiurn rubrum) and 1 perennial macroalga (Fucus vesiculosus).Nitrogen was the main limiting nutrient to algal growth and fast-growing algae were N limited for a longer period during summer than slower-growing species.Differences in the temporal extent of N limitation were related to species-specific variations in N requirements for growth and in N storage pools.The N requirements per unit biomass and time were up to 30-fold higher for fast-growing algae compared to slow-growing species due to 10-fold faster growth and 3-fold higher demands for the internal N concentration needed to sustain maximum growth (i.e.critical concentrations).The pools of N reserves only varied 2-fold among algal species and could support maximum growth for 0.5 d in the phytoplankton community and for 12 d in E vesiculosus.Growth of phytoplankton and E vesiculosus could proceed at reduced rates for another 2.6 and 34 d.respectively, based on other internal pools of N. The results suggest that the species-specific differences in growth rate and critical N concentrations account for a substantial part of the variation in the duration of nutrient limitation among different algal types and, therefore, provide further clarification of the reasons why fast-growing algae are stimulated by increased nutrient availability while slowgrowing algae remain unaffected or are hampered due to shading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioenergy potential of Ulva lactuca: Biomass yield, methane production and combustion
Bruhn, A., Dahl, J., Nielsen, H. B., Nikolaisen, L., Rasmussen, M. B., Markager, S., Olesen, B., Arias, C., & Jensen, P. D. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.010 · Cited by 441
Microalgae with Artificial Intelligence: A Digitalized Perspective on Genetics, Systems and Products
Teng, S. Y., Yew, G. Y., Sukačová, K., Show, P. L., Máša, V., & Chang, J.-S. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107631 · Cited by 145
Fan, X., Xu, D., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Cao, S., Mou, S., & Ye, N. (2014) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-013-0054-z · Cited by 115
Perrot, T., Rossi, N., Ménesguen, A., & Dumas, F. (2014) · Journal of Marine Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.12.010 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Pedersen, M., & Borum, J.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- 261-272
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2045410088
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps142261
- The paper
- Pedersen, M., & Borum, J. (1996). Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps142261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.