The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for spatial variability in estuarine food webs
Open accessAbstract
The importance of phytoplankton, benthic microalgae, fresh and salt marsh emergent plants, and terrestrial organic matter to the estuarine food w e b of Plum Island Sound, Massachusetts, USA, was evaluated using the stable isotopes of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur.Three distinct regions of the estuary were examined: the oligohaline upper estuary with high freshwater inputs and fringing fresh marsh, the middle estuary with extensive salt marsh, and the lower estuary with a greater proportion of open bay and a direct connection to open ocean.In each region, sources of organic matter for pelaglc and benthic aquatlc consumers were compared with the range of organic matter sources available in the entire estuary.Consumers in all regions relied most heavily on locally produced organic matter.In the upper estuary, most consumers had 613C values of -29 to -2 1 ' L and 634S values of about 8?L, whlch indicated dependence on a mixture of fresh marsh emergent vegetation and phytoplankton from the oligohaline region.In the middle and lower estuary, consumers had 613C values of -23 to -1 5 ' k and 634S values of 5 to 154., resembling a mixture of Spal-tina spp., benthic m~croalgae and marine phytoplankton.Terrestrial organic matter was of minimal importance in the upper estuary and was not evident in the food webs of the middle and lower estuary.The isotopic values of pelagic consumers reflected a greater dependence on phytoplankton than those of benthic consumers, which were closer to fresh or salt marsh emergent vegetation and benthic microalgae.Several of the patterns revealed by examination of organic matter sources for the food w e b of the Plum Island Sound estuary have implications for our general understanding of estuarine food webs.First, while there is substantial spatial heterogeneity in organic matter sources within a single estuary, consumers tend to utilize sources of organic matter produced In the same region of the estuary in which they reside.Second, consumer dependence on terrestrially derived riverine organic matter is minimal, even in the relatively small region of the estuary where ~t s availability is the highest Third, benthic and p e l a g ~c organisms rely on different mixes of organic matter sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thomas, C., & Cahoon, L. (1993) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps095019 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Minello, T., Able, K., Weinstein, M., & Hays, C. (2003) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps246039 · Cited by 384
Guo, W., Ye, F., Xu, S., & Jia, G. (2015) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2015.11.004 · Cited by 102
Maier, G. O., & Simenstad, C. A. (2009) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-009-9197-1 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Deegan, L., & Garritt, R.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 31-47
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2037317208
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for spatial variability in estuarine food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps147031
- The paper
- Deegan, L., & Garritt, R. (1997). Evidence for spatial variability in estuarine food webs. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps147031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.