Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-1994

Open access
Harding, LW, Perry, ES·1997·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

An analysis of historical and recent data on chlorophyll a for Chesapeake Bay reveals that a significant increase of phytoplankton biomass has occurred during the last 40 to 50 yr.Concentrations of chlorophyll a in the surface mixing layer have increased 5-to 10-fold in the seaward regions of the estuary and 1.5-to 2-fold elsewhere, paralleling published estimates of increased loading of N and P to the estuary since World War 11.The characteristic hlgh vanability of freshwater flow that occurs on seasonal to interannual time scales, however, drives fluctuations of chlorophyll a that are superimposed on this apparent upward trend, potentially obscuring the effects of overenrichment on chlorophyll a concentrations in nutrient-limited regions of the Bay To resolve a time trend of chlorophyll from this variability, we developed regional models of mean, monthly chlorophyll a using autoregressive moving average (ARMA) procedures.The models were developed with water quality data from monitoring cruises of the Chesapeake Bay Program spanning 1984 to 1992.The approach was to: (1) determine the relationship of prominent variables, including freshwater flow, salinity, temperature, region, and time of year, to chlorophyll a for the 'modern' Bay; (2) predict chlorophyll a for the 'historical' Bay based on these models and actual, observed variables for periods from 1950 to 1984 for which chlorophyll a data were available; (3) compare chlorophyll a predicted from modern relationships, to those observed in the past, using the residuals to identify deviations below or above expected concentrations that would suggest a n effect o n chlorophyll a unrelated to flow variability.The results show that: (1) observed and predicted chlorophyll a concentrations matched reasonably well for the years that were used to develop the models, with some exceptions when the models failed to capture extremely high concentrations of chlorophyll a during blooms; (2) chlorophyll a concentrations in the 1950% 1960s and 1970s were predominantly lower than predicted by the models, particularly in the mesohaline and polyhaline regions of the estuary that are most susceptible to nutrient limitation; (3) chlorophyll a concentrations were lower in the 1960s than in the 1970s probably as the result of low flow and a concomitant reduction of nutrient loading in the 'dry' 1960s as compared to the 'wet' 1970s; (4) interannual variability was high for both observed and predicted chlorophyll a concentrations in the 1970% and this variability was most strongly expressed in the mesohaline to polyhaline Bay, reflecting the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of phytoplankton that prevailed in that period.These findings support the hypothesis that a significant increase of chlorophyll a has occurred in the lower Bay that cannot be accounted for by variability of freshwater flow and attendant properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps157039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Harding, L., & Perry, E.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
1997
Volume
157
Pages
39-52
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2079337190
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-1994. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps157039
The paper
Harding, L., & Perry, E. (1997). Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-1994. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps157039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.