Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill

Open access
Croxall, JP, Reid, K, Prince, PA·1999·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Knowledge of relationships between prey availability and predator performance is the key to using predators as indicators of the state of marine systems and to assessing potential consequences of competition between natural predators and man for common resources.Fluctuations in the abundance of Antarctic knll are beiieved to have a substantial influence on the reproductive performance of krill-dependent top predator species in the Southern Ocean; few quantifications of such interactions exist.At South Georgia, for 2 years in which acoustic surveys revealed a major difference in knll abundance, we compared diet, prov~sioning of offspring and breeding success in 4 main predator species ( 2 penguins, 2 albatrosses, with supporting data from Antarctic fur seal) whose dependence on k r d typically ranges from 20 to 90%.The 4-fold difference in krill biomass between 1986 (ca 30 g m-2) and 1994 (ca 7 g m-2) was accompanied by (1) an 88 to 90% reduction in the mass of krill in predator dlets (and some increase in the fish component), (2) greater prey diversity for most species, (3) reduced diet overlap between species and (4) a switch from krill to amphipods in macaroni penguin but no major dietary change in other species.Rates of provisioning of offspring decreased by 90% in gentoo penguin and 40 to 50% in the other 3 species; this was due to reduced meal size in penguins (by 90% in gentoo and 50% in macaroni) and to doubling of foraging trip duration in albatrosses.Breeding success was reduced by 50% in grey-headed albatross (the species least dependent on krill), by 90% in black-browed albatross and gentoo penguin (only 3 to 4 % of eggs producing fledged chicks) but by only 10% in macaroni penguin, presumably reflecting its a b 5 t y to switch to small prey unprofitable for the other species.However, all species (except for black-browed albatross), particularly macaroni penguin, produced fledglings significantly lighter than usual, probably affecting their subsequent survival.Some effects on adult survival could also be inferred.Our results show a coherent, though complex, pattern of within and between species similarities and differences.These mainly reflect the degree of dependence on krill, the feasibility of taking alternative prey and constraints on trip duration andlor meal size imposed by foraging adaptations (especially relating to travel speeds and diving abilities, whereby flightless divers and pelagic foragers differ markedly).The generality of these principles are explored through comparison with other studies, particularly of Shetland seabirds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps177115

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Croxall, J., Reid, K., & Prince, P.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
1999
Volume
177
Pages
115-131
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W1982378294
Cited by
374
References
0
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps177115
The paper
Croxall, J., Reid, K., & Prince, P. (1999). Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps177115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.