Using winter flounder growth rates to assess habitat quality in Rhode Island’s coastal lagoons
Open accessAbstract
We used growth rates of juvenile winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus, to assess habitat quality in 3 of Rhode Island's coastal salt ponds that had differing levels of nutrients and human development.In each pond, 1 m 2 cages were placed in vegetated and unvegetated habitats and growth rates of individually marked fish were measured in three 10 to 15 d experiments from 4 June to 7 July 1997.Water temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and benthic food were also measured.Stable isotopes of C and N were measured in experimental and wild fish.Growth rates were 0.06 to 0.76 mm d -1 and decreased through the experiments.Growth rates of wild fish (0.19 mm d -1 in Point Judith Pond and 0.21 in Ninigret Pond) were similar to the average of the 2nd and 3rd experiments (0.24 mm d -1 ).Growth rates were the same in vegetated and unvegetated sites.They were also the same in Point Judith and Ninigret ponds but lower in Green Hill Pond.An ANCOVA suggested that Green Hill's lower rates were caused by its higher temperatures, particularly during the 3rd experiment.Benthic food was similar in the different ponds, different habitat types, and in cores taken inside and outside cages.Categories of food consumed by fish were not affected by the presence of vegetation in a cage, although food consumed did differ from pond to pond.Amphipods were the preferred food in all ponds; fish consumed proportionately more amphipods and fewer polychaetes in Ninigret Pond than in the other ponds.Values of δ 15 N in the fish varied with the degree of development in the watershed but not with total nitrogen in the water column.The results of this study indicate that growth rates of fish can be used as indicators of habitat quality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Growth is a common metric for juvenile fish habitat quality.
“We specifically focus on growth, which is a common metric for juvenile fish habitat quality [20–23], and varies between different types of nursery habitats for juvenile fish [24–27].”
From Estimating Common Growth Patterns in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Diverse Genetic Stocks and a Large Spatial Extent (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bousfield EL (1973) Shallow-water gammaridean Amphipoda of New England. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York
- Ernst LM (1996) The cumulative impacts of management decisions on nitrogen loading to the Rhode Island salt ponds. Master's thesis, University of Rhode Island, King- ston, RI Ferrell DJ, Bell JD (1991) Differences in assemblages of fish associated with Zostera capricorni and bare sand over a large spatial scale. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 72:15-24
- Heck KL Jr, Orth RJ (1980) Seagrass habitats: the role of habi- tat complexity, competition and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroinvertebrate assem- blages. In: VS Kennedy (ed) Estuarine perspectives. Acad- emic Press, New York, p 449-464
- Orth RJ, Hak KL Jr, van Montfrans JV (1984) Faunal commu- nities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey rela- tionships. Estuaries 7:339-350
- Sissenwine MP (1984) Why do fish populations vary? In: RM May (ed) Exploitation of marine communities. Springer- Verlag, New York, p 59-94
- Worobec MN (1982) Field analysis of winter flounder, Pseudo- pleuronectes americanus, in a coastal salt pond: abun- dance, daily ration, and annual consumption. PhD thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI Yelenik S, McCelland J, Feinstein N, Valiela I (1996) Changes in stable isotope signatures of particulate organic matter and ribbed mussels in estuaries subject to different nutri- ent loading. Biol Bull 191:329-330
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goertler, P. A. L., Scheuerell, M. D., Simenstad, C. A., & Bottom, D. L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162121 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meng, L., Gray, C., Taplin, B., & Kupcha, E.
- Affiliations
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (US)
- Roger Williams University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meng, L
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 201
- Pages
- 287-299
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2019627470
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
- Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- winter flounder, habitat quality, stable isotopes, stable nitrogen isotopes, stable carbon isotopes, Amphipoda, Polychaeta, water temperature, watershed development, biomonitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review