Cited by 71Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Environmental influences on the diel timing of spawning in coral reef fishes

Open access
Sancho, G, Solow, AR, Lobel, PS·2000·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Multiple hypotheses have been proposed regarding the adaptive nature of different diel reproductive cycles observed in coral reef fishes.This study quantified the spawning patterns of 11 different reef fish species at Johnston Atoll (Central Pacific), while making simultaneous measurements of the environmental factors likely to affect their spawning behaviors.The environmental variables measured (time of day, tides, current velocity, current speed and abundance of piscivores) were correlated with observed spawning outputs through multifactorial analyses.High interspecific variability in spawning patterns was found among the 11 monitored species.The majority of species spawned at a specific time of the day, in agreement with the timing of spawning described at other locations, indicative of a fixed general response by fishes across distribution areas.Spawning of most fishes with daytime spawning peaks was correlated with local changes in current direction and predatory risks, suggesting responses designed to reduce the mortality of propagules and adults.Dusk-spawning species generally did not respond to changes in flow direction and predator abundance, most likely due to their short spawning periods and the reduced predatory pressures that occurred at dusk.Tides did not seem to be used exclusively as synchronizing cues by adult fishes for spawning.The influence of current speed in determining diel timing of spawning varied among species; some avoided spawning during low current speeds while the majority showed no clear response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps206193

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delays in spawning activity have been identified in aggregating coral reef species in response to inappropriate currents or temperatures but have not been recorded in tuna species.

    “Delays in spawning activity have been identified in aggregating coral reef species in response to inappropriate currents or temperatures [34] but have not been recorded in tuna species.”

    From Spawning Dynamics and Size Related Trends in Reproductive Parameters of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Thunnus maccoyii (2015) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports that reef fish aggregated at a spawning site and delayed spawning until inflowing currents reversed. The paper supports the current-related delay, but the cited passages do not establish delays in response to inappropriate temperatures. The citation is attached to the coral-reef claim, not the subsequent statement about tuna. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Robertson DR (1991) The role of adult biology in the timing of spawning of tropical reef fish. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, p 356-386
  2. Sadovy YJ (1996) Reproduction of reef fishery species. In: Pol- unin NVC, Roberts CM (eds) Reef fisheries, Vol 20. Chap- man and Hall, London, p 15-59
  3. Sancho G (2000) Predatory behaviors of Caranx melampygus (Carangidae) feeding on spawning reef fishes: a novel ambushing strategy. Bull Mar Sci 66(2):487-496
  4. Smith RJF (1997) Avoiding and deterring predators. In: Godin JGJ (ed) Behavioral ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, p 163-189
  5. Warner RR (1991) The use of phenotypic plasticity in coral reef fishes as tests of theory in evolutionary ecology. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, p 387-398

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sancho, G., Solow, A., & Lobel, P.
Affiliations
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Corresponding author
Sancho, G
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2000
Volume
206
Pages
193-212
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2165021708
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  • University of Oxford
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-92-J-1969, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
coral reef fish, spawning synchrony, tides, current velocity, current direction, predation risk, interspecific variation, Johnston Atoll

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review