Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On measurement of filtration rate in bivalves-the stony road to reliable data: review and interpretation

Open access
Riisgård, HU·2001·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

This review deals with the measurement of filtration rates in suspension feeding bivalves.Currently used methods are described, and some reliable filtration rate data obtained under optimal laboratory conditions are presented.The different methods have often caused troubles, and a number of problems and shortcomings are brought to light.The conflicting data on filtration rates seem partly to be due to the incorrect use of methods, and partly to be caused by differences in experimental conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps211275

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Riisgård, H.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2001
Volume
211
Pages
275-291
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2006715309
Cited by
366
References
51
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On measurement of filtration rate in bivalves-the stony road to reliable data: review and interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps211275
The paper
Riisgård, H. (2001). On measurement of filtration rate in bivalves-the stony road to reliable data: review and interpretation. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps211275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.