Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables

Open access
Wilson, RP, Grémillet, D, Syder, J, Kierspel, MAM, Garthe, S, Weimerskirch, H, Schäfer-Neth, C, Scolaro, JA, Bost, CA, Plötz, J, Nel, D·2002·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

We examined how seabirds might be used to study marine environmental variables, which necessitates knowing location and the value of the variable to be studied.Five systems can potentially be used for determination of location: VHF (Very High Frequency) telemetry, PTT (Platform Terminal Transmitters) telemetry, GLS (Global Location Service) geolocation methods, dead reckoning and GPS (Global Positioning System), each with its own advantages with respect to accuracy, potential number of fixes and size.Temperature and light were used to illustrate potential difficulties in recording environmental variables.Systems currently used on seabirds for measurement of temperature respond slowly to environmental changes; thus, they may not measure sea surface temperature adequately when contact periods with water bodies are too short.Light can be easily measured for light extinction studies, but sensor orientation plays a large role in determining recorded values.Both problems can be corrected.The foraging behaviour of seabirds was also examined in order to identify those features which would be useful for determination of marine environmental variables at a variety of spatial and temporal scales.Area coverage by birds is highly dependent on breeding phase and tends to be concentrated in areas where prey acquisition is particularly enhanced.The identification of these sites may be of particular interest to marine biologists.'Plungers' and 'divers' are potentially most useful for assessment of variables deeper within the water column, with some divers spending up to 90% of their time sub-surface.Few seabirds exploit the water column deeper than 20 m, although some divers regularly exceed 50 m (primarily penguins and auks), while 2 species dive in excess of 300 m.The wide-ranging behaviour of seabirds coupled, in many instances, with their substantial body size makes them potentially excellent carriers of sophisticated environmental measuring technology; however, the ethical question of how much the well-being of birds can, and should, be compromised by such an approach needs to be carefully considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps228241

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, R., Grémillet, D., Syder, J., Kierspel, M., Garthe, S., Weimerskirch, H., Schäfer-Neth, C., Scolaro, J., Bost, C., Plötz, J., & Nel, D.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2002
Volume
228
Pages
241-261
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W1970457292
Cited by
207
References
1
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps228241
The paper
Wilson, R., Grémillet, D., Syder, J., Kierspel, M., Garthe, S., Weimerskirch, H., Schäfer-Neth, C., Scolaro, J., Bost, C., Plötz, J., & Nel, D. (2002). Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps228241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.