Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment

Open access
Ysebaert, T, Herman, PMJ·2002·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

We quantified the distribution, abundance, biomass and assemblage structure of benthic macrofauna at different spatio-temporal scales in a temperate estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment in the Schelde estuary, The Netherlands.Hierarchically scaled surveys were conducted yearly between 1994 and 2000, covering 4 spatial scales: region (10 4 m), transect (10 3 m), station (10 2 m), and replicate samples (10 -1 m).Our approach provided a powerful framework for quantifying the proportion of the variation among samples that was attributable to each spatial or temporal scale, and we explicitly aimed at identifying the role of environmental variables in explaining the observed variability.Variance components calculated for 11 dominant macrobenthic species revealed that variations at the scale of stations and year × station interactions were the most important components of variability.Regional and transect differences were only apparent for a few species, although multivariate analysis revealed clear inter-regional differences for the macrobenthic assemblage structure.Only a few species displayed significant variability associated with the factor year solely.Both spatial and temporal components explained > 70% of the total variance.A substantial part of the total variation in abundance of individual species was explained by the observed environmental variables (27 to 56%).Multiple regression with subdivision of the environmental variables into a long-term average and a temporal component showed that the long-term averages were much more important than the short-term deviations from this average, with local environmental variables (mud content, chlorophyll a, bed level height) explaining the largest part of the observed variation.For a few species and total biomass, salinity also explained a large part of the observed variation.Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) with forward selection revealed that salinity and mud content, and to a lesser extent chlorophyll a and bed-level height, accounted for most of the variance in the macrobenthic species data.Partial CCA indicated that of the variation in the species data a large part was spatially structured (56.7%), with about half of this variation being explained by the environmental variables used.Only 4.1% of the species variation was temporally structured.Our results have important consequences for both the interpretation of monitoring programmes and the enhancement of sampling designs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps244105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Ysebaert, T., & Herman, P.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2002
Volume
244
Pages
105-124
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2144481553
Cited by
354
References
0
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps244105
The paper
Ysebaert, T., & Herman, P. (2002). Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps244105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.