The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eelgrass Zostera marina loss in temperate estuaries: relationship to land-derived nitrogen loads and effect of light limitation imposed by algae
Open accessAbstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 247:59-73 (2003) - doi:10.3354/meps247059 Eelgrass Zostera marina loss in temperate estuaries: relationship to land-derived nitrogen loads and effect of light limitation imposed by algae Jennifer Hauxwell1,2,4,*, Just Cebrián1,3,5, Ivan Valiela1 1Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 2Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, DNR Research Center, 1350 Femrite Drive, Monona, Wisconsin 53716, USA 3Dauphin Island Sea Lab, 101 Bienville Boulevard, PO Box 369-370, Dauphin Island, Alabama 36528, USA 4Present address: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, DNR Research Center, 1350 Femrite Drive, Monona, Wisconsin 53716, USA 5Present address: Dauphin Island Sea Lab, 101 Bienville Boulevard, PO Box 369-370, Dauphin Island, Alabama 36528, USA *Email: jennifer.hauxwell@dnr.state.wi.us ABSTRACT: In this paper, we explicitly link changes in community structure of estuarine primary producers to measured nitrogen loading rates from watersheds to estuaries, and quantify the relationship between nitrogen load, annual dynamics of algal growth and Zostera marina L. productivity, and overall eelgrass decline at the watershed-estuarine scale in estuaries of Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts, USA. Substantial eelgrass loss (80 to 96% of bed area lost in the last decade) was found at loads of ~30 kgN ha-1 yr-1, and total disappearance at loads ≥60 kg N ha-1 yr-1. Rather than decreased eelgrass growth rates, we observed an exponential decrease in shoot densities and bed area (and subsequently areal production) as nitrogen loads increased, suggesting that eelgrass decline in higher-nitrogen estuaries of the Waquoit system occurred largely via lack of recruitment or enhanced mortality of established shoots. Similar to the patterns observed in many other systems and the experimental results obtained in laboratories or mesocosms, the relationship we observed between nitrogen loads and eelgrass health within the Waquoit system was indirect: increased nitrogen stimulated growth and standing stocks of algal producers, that may have caused severe light limitation of eelgrass. From light budgets that considered water column, epiphyte, and macroalgal shading, we estimated chronic, severe light limitation to newly recruiting shoots in higher-nitrogen estuaries, due mainly to shading by a coexisting ≤15 cm macroalgal canopy. Two management recommendations aimed at eelgrass preservation emerge from this work. First, development and management of watersheds must be conducted such that land-derived nitrogen loading to estuaries is restricted. In the Waquoit Bay estuaries, for example, eelgrass is absent or rapidly disappearing from all but those receiving the lowest (≤15th percentile) loads. Second, shoot density and meadow area, rather than g rates per shoot, seem to be adequate variables for routine monitoring of eelgrass health. We also show that the shift from eelgrass- to algae-dominated communities has important consequences for total system primary production and carbon and nitrogen cycling. Estimated total primary production by coastal assemblages in the Waquoit Bay system was 135% higher in estuaries receiving relatively high versus low loads of land-derived nitrogen, suggesting important trophic and biogeochemical alterations to temperate estuarine ecosystems as a result of eutrophication. KEY WORDS: Seagrass · Macroalgae · Epiphytes · Phytoplankton · Irradiance · Waquoit Bay · Eutrophication · Estuary Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 247. Online publication date: February 04, 2003 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2003 Inter-Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes
Duarte, C. M. (1995) · Ophelia · doi:10.1080/00785236.1995.10422039 · Cited by 924
van Lent, F., & Verschuure, J. M. (1994) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/0304-3770(94)90072-8 · Cited by 89
Cited by
Boudouresque, C. F., Bernard, G., Pergent, G., Shili, A., & Verlaque, M. (2009) · botm · doi:10.1515/bot.2009.057 · Cited by 406
Eelgrass recovery after nutrient enrichment reversal
Vaudrey, J. M. P., Kremer, J. N., Branco, B. F., & Short, F. T. (2010) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.08.005 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauxwell, J., Cebrián, J., & Valiela, I.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 247
- Pages
- 59-73
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2038980274
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eelgrass Zostera marina loss in temperate estuaries: relationship to land-derived nitrogen loads and effect of light limitation imposed by algae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps247059
- The paper
- Hauxwell, J., Cebrián, J., & Valiela, I. (2003). Eelgrass Zostera marina loss in temperate estuaries: relationship to land-derived nitrogen loads and effect of light limitation imposed by algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps247059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.