Cited by 26Marine and fisheries researchCoastal and Marine ManagementFish Ecology and Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Paradigm shifts, gaps, inertia, and political agendas in ecosystem-based fisheries management

Open access
Tudela, S, Short, K·2005·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Masood E (1997) Fisheries science: all at sea when

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps300282

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Tudela, S., & Short, K.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2005
Volume
300
Pages
282-286
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2021119518
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • North Pacific Marine Science Organization
  • Havforskningsinstituttet
  • Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
ecosystem-based fisheries management, paradigm shift, research gaps, inertia, political agenda, fisheries policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradigm shifts, gaps, inertia, and political agendas in ecosystem-based fisheries management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps300282
The paper
Tudela, S., & Short, K. (2005). Paradigm shifts, gaps, inertia, and political agendas in ecosystem-based fisheries management. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps300282