Cited by 78Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine and fisheries researchIchthyology and Marine Biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Location influences size-selective predation on newly settled reef fish

Open access
Holmes, TH, McCormick, MI·2006·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Demersal fish usually settle to established fish assemblages that include suites of gapelimited predators, whose compositions vary among locations.We investigated the extent to which predation was size-selective on a species of newly settled coral reef fish, the damselfish Pomacentrus amboinensis (Bleeker 1868), among 3 lagoonal sites on 1 reef.The 3 sites at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, differed in species composition and relative abundance of predators.Fish at the end of their larval phase were caught in light traps and tattooed for individual recognition.They were then paired so that there was a 1 mm difference between partners, and placed on small patch reefs at the base of the 3 shallow lagoonal sites.Large individuals survived significantly better than small individuals in 1 out of 3 sites.One site displayed the reverse trend, even though non-significant, and the third site showed no evidence of selection.Selection was strongest at the site where predators of small reef fishes were in highest densities and water currents were strongest.Strong water currents appeared to emphasise size-related differences in swimming ability and increase the vulnerability of small fish at this site.Our results suggested that the occurrence of size-selection for this species at settlement will depend on the composition of the predator assemblage and prevailing environmental conditions; these both interact with the performance attributes of prey, and all 3 variables may be location-specific.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps317203

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Holmes, T., & McCormick, M.
Affiliations
James Cook University (AU)
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2006-07-18
Volume
317
Pages
203-209
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2085216054
Cited by
78
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
size-selective predation, coral reef fish, Pomacentrus amboinensis, Pomacentridae, water currents, swimming ability, prey vulnerability, patch reefs, lagoons, Great Barrier Reef, Lizard Island

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review