The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community-wide effects of marine reserves in the Mediterranean Sea
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the community-wide effects of no-take marine reserves at the regional scale in the Mediterranean Sea.Reserves had general positive effects of protection on fish targeted by fishing, and variable effects on non-target species.Differences in the structure of fish assemblages (in terms of abundance of species and trophic groups) were greater between geographic locations than when compared among all protected and adjacent fished areas at the regional scale.These results suggest that the assemblage-wide response to protection at the species level may be spatially idiosyncratic, as a function of local factors.However, the functional (trophic group) response of the fish assemblages to protection appears to be more general.Response of fish assemblages to protection was significantly related to reserve age (i.e.duration of protection) only when evaluated at functional level, whereas reserve size did not appear to influence fish assemblages at either species or functional level.Reserves can enhance trophic cascades and ecological shifts once the density of fish predators of sea urchins reaches a density threshold of about 15 adult sea breams (Diplodus sargus and D. vulgaris, the most important sea urchin predators) per 100 m 2 .These non-linearities in the community-wide effect of reserves suggest that caution is needed in simplistically treating reserves and unprotected areas as 2 experimental treatments in ecological studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743
Ecological Meltdown in Predator-Free Forest Fragments
Terborgh, J., Lopez, L., Nuñez, P., Rao, M., Shahabuddin, G., Orihuela, G., Riveros, M., Ascanio, R., Adler, G. H., Lambert, T. D., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064397 · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features
Edgar, G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Willis, T. J., Kininmonth, S., Baker, S. C., Banks, S., Barrett, N. S., Becerro, M. A., Bernard, A. T. F., Berkhout, J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13022 · Cited by 1,922
Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis
Lester, S., Halpern, B., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B., Gaines, S., Airamé, S., & Warner, R. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08029 · Cited by 1,447
A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets
Dinerstein, E., Vynne, C., Sala, E., Joshi, A. R., Fernando, S., Lovejoy, T. E., Mayorga, J., Olson, D., Asner, G. P., Baillie, J. E. M., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw2869 · Cited by 792
Self-citationNo-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean
Sala, E., & Giakoumi, S. (2018) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsx059 · Cited by 526
Self-citationRecovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems
Lotze, H. K., Coll, M., Magera, A. M., Ward-Paige, C., & Airoldi, L. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.008 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Guidetti, P., & Sala, E.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2007-04-16
- Volume
- 335
- Pages
- 43-56
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2169202201
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community-wide effects of marine reserves in the Mediterranean Sea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps335043
- The paper
- Guidetti, P., & Sala, E. (2007). Community-wide effects of marine reserves in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps335043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.