The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kinetics and Kinematics for Translational Motions in Microgravity During Parabolic Flight
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Astronauts soaring through space modules with the grace of birds seems counterintuitive. How do they adapt to the weightless environment? Previous spaceflights have shown that astronauts in orbit adapt their motor strategies to each change in their gravitational environment. During adaptation, performance is degraded and can lead to mission-threatening injuries. If adaptation can occur before a mission, productivity during the mission might improve, minimizing risk. The goal is to combine kinetic and kinematic data to examine translational motions during microgravity adaptations. METHODS: Experiments were performed during parabolic flights aboard NASA's C-9. Five subjects used their legs to push off from a sensor, landing on a target 3.96 m (13 ft) away. The sensor quantified the kinetics during contact, while four cameras recorded kinematics during push-off. Joint torques were calculated for a subset of traverses (N = 50) using the forces, moments, and joint angles. RESULTS: During the 149 traverses, the average peak force exerted onto the sensor was 224.6 +/- 74.6 N, with peak values ranging between 65.8-461.9 N. Two types of force profiles were observed, some having single, strong peaks (N = 64) and others having multiple, weaker peaks (N = 86). CONCLUSIONS: The force data were consistent with values recorded previously in sustained microgravity aboard Mir and the Space Shuttle. A training program for astronauts might be designed to encourage fine-control motions (i.e., multiple, weaker peaks) as these reduce the risk of injury and increase controllability. Additionally, a kinematic and kinetic sensor suite was successfully demonstrated in the weightless environment onboard the C-9 aircraft.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sharova, L. V., Sharov, A. A., Nedorezov, T., Piao, Y., Shaik, N., & Ko, M. S. H. (2009) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsn030 · Cited by 591
Nie, M., Abraham, D. P., Chen, Y., Bose, A., & Lucht, B. L. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp404155y · Cited by 578
Le, D. T., Nishiyama, R., Watanabe, Y., Mochida, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Shinozaki, K., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2011) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsr015 · Cited by 450
Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot
Onal, C. D., & Rus, D. (2013) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3182/8/2/026003 · Cited by 375
Impulsivity and suicidality: The mediating role of painful and provocative experiences
Bender, T. W., Gordon, K. H., Bresin, K., & Joiner, T. E. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.023 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Stirling, L., Willcox, K., Ferguson, P., & Newman, D.
- Venue
- Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- Aerospace Medical Association
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 522-531
- ISSN
- 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
- 0095-6562
- OpenAlex
- W1999075212
- Cited by
- 5,259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 300.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics and Kinematics for Translational Motions in Microgravity During Parabolic Flight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3357/asem.2356.2009
- The paper
- Stirling, L., Willcox, K., Ferguson, P., & Newman, D. (2009). Kinetics and Kinematics for Translational Motions in Microgravity During Parabolic Flight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.2356.2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.