Cited by 8Spaceflight effects on biologyNausea and vomiting managementDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Visual Side Effects of Scopolamine/ Dextroamphetamine Among Parabolic Fliers

Makowski, Andrew L., Lindgren, Kjell, Locke, James P.·2011·Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scopolamine/dextroamphetamine has been used to combat motion sickness generated aboard research aircraft for decades. While it has shown to be effective, previous studies differ as to the presence of visual side effects secondary to scopolamine's anticholinergic properties. This study sought to quantify any such effects in order to determine if they are operationally significant. METHODS: Fliers in NASA's Reduced Gravity Program received a weight-based dose of scopolamine/ dextroamphetamine prior to boarding the aircraft. Measurements of pupil size, visual acuity, and accommodation were taken in identical conditions using subjects' dominant eyes prior to medication administration and again after landing. We enrolled 131 subjects ages 18-48. Pre- and postflight measurements of pupil size and acuity were available for 125 subjects. RESULTS: Average pupil size increased by 1.1 mm (95% CI 0.9-1.2). Only 1.6% of subjects experienced a change in visual acuity of greater than 10 ft. The average near-point accommodation changed from 8.61 to 7.84 diopters, a difference of -0.77 (-1.01 to -0.53) diopters or 1.34 cm (0.87-1.81). Increasing age also correlated significantly with worsening change in accommodation. DISCUSSION: This study found statistically significant changes in pupil size and near point accommodation that do not appear to be clinically important. No significant decrement in acuity was noted. While direct effects on in-flight performance could not be assessed, the use of scopolamine/dextroamphetamine among fliers aboard research aircraft does not appear to yield visual side effects sufficient to compromise later ground operations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.2750.2011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Makowski, A. L., Lindgren, K., & Locke, J. P.
Affiliations
St. Joseph Regional Medical Center (US)
Venue
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
82
Issue
7
Pages
683-688
ISSN
  • 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-6562
OpenAlex
W2071233956
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
anticholinergic effects, pupil size, visual acuity, parabolic flight, reduced gravity, in-flight performance
MeSH terms
Accommodation, Ocular, Adolescent, Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Dextroamphetamine, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Scopolamine, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Cholinergic Antagonists, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review