Cited by 40Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOccupational Health and PerformanceErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neck Proprioception, Strength, Flexibility, and Posture in Pilots With and Without Neck Pain History

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neck pain (NP) is common among military helicopter pilots. Older age and more flight-hours have been associated with pilots with a history of NP. However, modifiable neuromuscular and musculoskeletal characteristics such as neck proprioception, strength, flexibility, and posture have rarely been investigated in military helicopter pilots with a history of NP. The purpose of the study was to compare demographics, flight characteristics, physical fitness information, neck proprioception, strength, flexibility, and posture between helicopter pilots with and without a history of NP. METHODS: A total of 27 Army helicopter pilots with NP in the past 12 mo (pain group) were matched based on age with pilots without a history of NP (nonpain group). All pilots had flown at least 100 h in the past 12 mo and were cleared for flight and physical training. All pilots completed a battery of laboratory testing: neck proprioception, neck and scapular muscular strength, neck active range-of-motion (ROM), forward head and shoulder posture, and pectoralis minor length. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were used to compare differences between groups. RESULTS: The pain group had significantly less cervical extension (63.7 +/- 8.5 degrees) and rotation ROM (R rotation: 67.7 +/- 8.8 degrees; L rotation: 67.4 +/- 9.0 degrees) when compared to the nonpain group (extension: 68.3 +/- 7.4 degrees; R rotation: 73.4 +/- 7.4 degrees; L rotation: 72.9 +/- 6.8 degrees). No significant differences were found for other variables. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate less neck active ROM in pilots with a history of NP. Operating a helicopter with limited neck ROM or NP may negatively impact flight safety and force readiness. Continued research is warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.3874.2014

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nagai, T., Abt, J. P., Sell, T. C., Clark, N. C., Smalley, B. W., Wirt, M. D., & Lephart, S. M.
Venue
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
529-535
ISSN
  • 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-6562
OpenAlex
W2325237715
Cited by
40
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
neck pain, military helicopter pilots, neck proprioception, neck muscle strength, neck flexibility, active range of motion, scapular posture, forward head posture, pectoralis minor length, cervical extension, cervical rotation, flight safety, musculoskeletal fitness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Posture, Proprioception, Range of Motion, Articular, Neck Pain, Muscle Strength, Air Travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review