Cited by 19Pasture and Agricultural SystemsRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Nutritive value of subtropical grasses invading North Island pastures

Open access
Jackson, F.S., Mcnabb, W.C., Peters, J.S., Barry, T.N., Campbell, B.D., Ulyatt, M.J.·1995·Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

Abstract

A study was undertaken to ascertain the possible nutritional impact of subtropical grass invasion into pastures, by chemically analysing five common subtropical grasses. Leaves taken from kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum), paspalum (Paspalum dilatatum), smooth witchgrass (Panicurn dichotomiforum), crowfoot (Eleusine indica), and summer grass (Digitaria sanguinalis) were collected from grassland in the North Auckland, Waikato and Manawatu regions. Leaves of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) were also taken from each pasture as a reference temperate grass. Relative to perennial ryegrass the subtropical species clearly showed increased levels of neutral detergent fibre (NDF; 38.4% vs 57.5%) but reduced levels of total protein (23.0% vs 13.2%), soluble sugar (11.7% vs 5.9%) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (OMD; 84.0% vs 66.6%). Similar results were obtained for grasses grown in each of the three areas. Of the subtropical grasses, summer grass was of the highest nutritive value and crowfoot was of the lowest. The results of an in vitro rumen protein degradation experiment showed net ammonia produdtion from pasture fermentation was significantly lower for the subtropical species than for perennial ryegrass. The present study indicates that the subtropical grasses are of considerably lower nutritive value than perennial ryegrass. Their cont.inued spreading into grazing pastures will probably substantially decrease the nutritive value of the pastures and animal production. Keywords: nutritive value, subtropical grasses

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33584/jnzg.1995.57.2157

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, F. S., Mcnabb, W. C., Peters, J. S., Barry, T. N., Campbell, B. D., & Ulyatt, M. J.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Venue
Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association
Published
1995-01-01
Pages
203-206
ISSN
  • 0369-3902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-4577
OpenAlex
W2163089550
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AgResearch
  • Massey University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
pasture nutritive value, Kikuyu, Paspalum, perennial ryegrass, neutral detergent fiber, in vitro organic matter digestibility, rumen protein degradation, grazing pastures, North Island

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review