Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prescription Event Monitoring of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Liver Injury and Outcomes of Rechallenge: A 10-Year Experience

Atallah, Edmond, Oshaughnessy, Ana, Dolapo, Igboin, Moore, Yvette, Ntata, Joyce, Rao, Ankit, Franks, Hester, Patel, Poulam M., Aithal, Guruprasad P.·2022·EMJ Hepatology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33590/emjhepatol/10057736

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. De Martin E et al. Liver toxicity as a limiting factor to the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. JHEP Rep. 2020;2(6):100170. · DOI
  2. Aithal GP et al. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(6):806-15. · DOI
  3. Danan G, Teschke R. RUCAM in drug and herb induced liver injury: the update. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(1):14. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Atallah, E., Oshaughnessy, A., Dolapo, I., Moore, Y., Ntata, J., Rao, A., Franks, H., Patel, P. M., & Aithal, G. P.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, UK
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; Centre for Cancer Sciences, Translational Medical Sciences, BioDiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, UK
Venue
EMJ Hepatology
Published
2022-08-04
Pages
32-34
ISSN
2053-4221
Cited by
0
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review