Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking ‘Sex Robots’: Gender, Desire, and Embodiment in Posthuman Sextech

Locatelli, Chloé·2022·Journal of Digital Social Research
DOI 10.33621/jdsr.v4i3.87
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper interrogates the posthuman potential of sextech aimed at heterosexual men, positing that advertising and design of products with digital femininities emphasise the possibility for emotional interaction. This work firstly applies pressure to the monolithic conceptualisation of ‘sex robots’, that impedes rigorously appraising existing sextech constructions. Applying posthuman theory to sextech, particularly critical posthumanism and the formative work of Donna Haraway, affords this investigation the theoretical rigour to reflect on the potential for emotional interaction with digital feminised others. Through digital media analysis, this paper explores three gendered-female technologies: Azuma Hikari, (2020); the RealdollX Application (2020) and VirtualMate (2020) alongside their concomitant promotional material. This research illustrates that the complex convergence of interactive technologies, digital feminities and emotive advertising suggests a shift into posthuman sextech – where digital feminities are designed and advertised as capable of providing erotic and emotive interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33621/jdsr.v4i3.87

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bendel, O. (2020). Maschinenliebe: Liebespuppen und Sexroboter aus technischer, psychologischer und philosophischer Perspektive. Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29864 · DOI
  2. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.
  3. Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
  4. Haraway, D. (2004). The Haraway Reader. Routledge.
  5. Mcintyre, A. (2020). Gendering Cuteness. In The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc285 · DOI
  6. Ranish, R., & Sorgner, S. L. (2014). Introducing Post- and Transhumanism. In R. Ranish & S. L. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction (pp. 7–27). Peter Lang.
  7. Scheutz, M., & Arnold, T. (2017). Intimacy, Bonding, and Sex Robots: Examining Empirical Results and Exploring Ethical Ramifications. In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications (pp. 444–469). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036689.001.0001/ · DOI
  8. Wilde, P. & Evans, A. (2019) Empathy at play: Embodying posthuman subjectivities in gaming. Convergence. [Online] 25 (5–6), 791–806. [online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/135485651770998. · DOI
  9. Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment in Digital Spheres: Connecting Intersectionality and Digitality

Cited by

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Locatelli, C.
Venue
Journal of Digital Social Research
Publisher
DIGSUM (Centre for Digital Social Research)
Published
2022-07-29
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
10-33
ISSN
2003-1998
DOI
10.33621/jdsr.v4i3.87
Cited by
17
References
67
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.