Cited by 15Qur’anic Interpretation StudiesLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisIslamic Thought and Society Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Early Arabic Grammarians' Contributions to the Collection and Authentication of Qur'anic Readings: The Prelude to Ibn Mujāhid's Kitāb al-Sabca

Open access
Shah, Mustafa·2004·Journal of Qur'anic Studies

Abstract

The ninth and tenth centuries of the classical Islamic tradition are often viewed as periods in which distinctive shifts towards the consolidation, standardisation and homogeneity of Islamic thought and concepts are discernible. Accordingly, Ibn Mujāhid's authorship of his renowned Kitāb al-Sab c a and his efforts to accentuate a set of seven Qur'anic readings are invariably contextualised within the accommodating confines of these perceived shifts across the gamut of the classical Islamic sciences. Yet the trajectory followed by Ibn Mujāhid's text owes its dynamics to an entirely different set of factors. This article proposes that the methodical efforts of Ibn Mujāhid were an extension of the attempts by Qur'anic readers to reinvigorate the traditional conventions of adhering to defined precedents in the authentication of the readings of scripture. Notwithstanding the fact that the nature of variances among Qur'anic readings was infinitesimal, endeavours in this area are governed by the liturgical value of lectiones. In order to gauge the broad significance of the Kitāb al-Sab c a, the text has to be placed in the well-defined context of the genesis and development of Arabic linguistic thought.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3366/jqs.2004.6.1.72

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.3366/jqs.2003.5.1.47 · DOI
  2. Early Arabic Linguistic Thought, 2003, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5, 1
  3. The Qur'än, 2003, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5, 134
  4. 10.2307/1595294 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S0020743800059274 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/1595001 · DOI
  7. Makdisi, Studia Islamica, 59, 18
  8. 10.1163/1570058972582461 · DOI
  9. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5, 63
  10. For, Journal ofQur'anic Studies, 5, 47
  11. Shah, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5
  12. Shah, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5
  13. än M., 2001, Dar Ibn Hazm, 1
  14. Imam Variant, 1998, International Institute of Islamic Thought, 135
  15. I, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5, 2
  16. Abi Tälib's, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5, 70
  17. 10.3366/jqs.2000.2.1.1 · DOI
  18. See, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5
  19. Shah, Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 5, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Shah, M.
Affiliations
SOAS University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Shah, Mustafa
Venue
Journal of Qur'anic Studies
Published
2004-04
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
72-102
ISSN
  • 1465-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-1730
OpenAlex
W2025761494
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Qur anic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
Keywords
Quranic recitation, Arabic grammarians, Arabic linguistic thought, classical Islamic scholarship, 9th-10th centuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review