The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Теория магнитного термоядерного реактора
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, in scenarios of gravity induced due to matter loops [221,222], the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is solely due to entanglement due to vacuum fluctuations [223][224][225], where the UV-cutoff dependence can be absorbed in a renormalization of Newton's constant [130].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [221]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life
Barnes, L. A. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as12015 · Cited by 156
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Under an iron sky: On the entropy at the start of the Universe
Barnes, L. A., & Lewis, G. F. (2021) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.54 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakharov, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prosp. 53, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
- Venue
- Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk
- Published
- 1967-11
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 564-571
- ISSN
- 0042-1294
- 1996-6652
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- ru
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
