Cited by 71

Social Security and Elderly Living Arrangements: Evidence from the Social Security Notch

Engelhardt, Gary V., Gruber, Jonathan, Perry, Cynthia D.·2005·Journal of Human Resources

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3368/jhr.xl.2.354

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elderly divorcees were more income elastic in living arrangements than widows, never-married elders were less elastic, and married elders were not elastic at all.

    “In addition, elderly divorcees were even more income elastic in their living arrangements.But those who are never married are less elastic, and those are married are not at all elastic.”

    From Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty (2004) · cites this paper as Engelhardt, Gruber and Perry (2002)

  • This -0.34 estimate is much closer to the full-sample -0.4 estimate in Engelhardt, Gruber and Perry (2002), which used more restricted birth cohorts.

    “This is much closer to the full sample -0.4 estimate in Engelhardt, Gruber and Perry (2002), which was estimated on a more restricted set of birth cohorts.”

    From Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty (2004) · cites this paper as Engelhardt, Gruber and Perry (2002)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Blazer, Dan G. (1982). "Social Support and Mortality in an Elderly Community Population," American Journal of Epidemiology, 115, 684-94.
  2. Börsch-Supan, Axel, Vassilis Hajivassiliou, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, and John N. Morris (1992). "Health, Children, and Elderly Living Arrangements: A Multiperiod- Multinomial Probit Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity and Autocorrelated Errors," in David A. Wise, ed., Topics in the Economics of Aging. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), 79-104.
  3. Clarke, M., S. J. Clarke, and C. Jagger (1992). "Social Intervention and the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial," American Journal of Epidemiology 136 (12), 1517-23.
  4. Costa, Dora L. (1997). "Displacing the Family: Union Army Pensions and Elderly Living Arrangements," Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6), 1269-1292.
  5. Costa, Dora L. (1998). The Evolution of Retirement. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
  6. Costa, Dora L. (1999). "A House of Her Own: Old Age Assistance and Living Arrangements of Older Nonmarried Women," Journal of Public Economics, 72 (1), 39-60.
  7. Cwikel, J., A. V. Fried, and D. Galinsky (1989). "Falls and Psychosocial Factors among Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons: A Review and Integration of Findings from Israel," Public Health Review, 17(1), 39-50.
  8. Gurley, R. Jan, Nancy Lum, Merle Sande, Bernard Lo, and Mitchell Katz (1996). "Persons Found in their Homes Helpless or Dead," The New England Journal of Medicine (June 27) 334:26, 1710-6.
  9. Kobrin, Frances E. (1976). "The Fall in Household Size and the Rise of the Primary Individual in the United States," Demography, 13 (1), 127-138.
  10. Krueger, Alan, and Jörn-Steffen Pischke (1992). "The Effect of Social Security on Labor Supply: A Cohort Analysis of the Notch Generation," Journal of Labor Economics, 10, 412-437.
  11. Kramarow, Ellen A. (1995). "The Elderly Who Live Alone in the United States: Historical Perspectives on Household Change," Demography 32 (3), 335-352.
  12. Macunovich, Diane J., Richard A. Easterlin, Christine M. Schaeffer, and Eileen M. Crimmins (1995). "Echoes of the Baby Boom and Bust: Recent and Prospective Changes in Living Alone among Elderly Widows in the United States," Demography, 32 (1), 17-28.
  13. McGarry, Kathleen, and Robert F. Schoeni (2000). "Social Security, Economic Growth, and the Rise in Elderly Widows' Independence in the Twentieth Century," Demography, 37 (2), 221-236.
  14. Michael, Robert T., Victor R. Fuchs, Sharon R. Scott (1980). "Changes in the Propensity to Live Alone," Demography, 17 (1), 39-56.
  15. Reuben, D. B., L. V. Rubenstein, S. H. Hirsch, R. D. Hayes, "Value of Functional Status as a Predictor of Mortality: Results from a Prospective Study," The American Journal of Medicine, 93(6), 663-9.
  16. Tromp, A. M., Smit, J. H., Deeg, D. J., Bouter, L. M., and P. Lips (1998). "Predictors for Falls and Fractures in the Longitudinal Aging Study, Amsterdam," Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 13(12), 1932-9.
  17. United States Social Security Administration, Various Years. Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement (Washington, D.C.: United States Social Security Administration).
  18. Wolf, Douglas A. and Beth J. Soldo (1988). "Household Composition Choices of Older Unmarried Women," Demography, 25 (3), 387-403.
  19. Wolf, Douglas A. (1995). "Changes in the Living Arrangements of Older Women: An International Study," The Gerontologist, 35 (6), 724-731.
  20. Zukerman, Diana M., Stanislav V. Kasl, and Adrian M. Ostfeld (1984). "Psychosocial Predictors of Mortality Among the Elderly Poor: The Role of Religion, Well- Being, and Social Contacts," American Journal of Epidemiology, 119, 410-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engelhardt, G. V., Gruber, J., & Perry, C. D.
Venue
Journal of Human Resources
Published
2005
Volume
XL
Issue
2
Pages
354-372
ISSN
  • 0022-166X
  • 1548-8004
Cited by
71
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review